Re: [802.19] Comments on Draft Liaison
Steve,
Thanks for the update. I personally would prefer to leave language on
consensus in the letter. Consensus in development of standards is an
important concept that I prefer not to obscure. I look forward to the
discussion this afternoon in .19.
Jim
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Shellhammer, Steve
<sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rich,
>
>
>
> Thanks for leading the group of interested parties in
> updating the liaison yesterday.
>
>
>
> I made some suggested edits, which are attached.
>
>
>
> We can discuss these and any other comments from others at
> the PM2 WG meeting later today.
>
>
>
> My main two comments are,
>
>
>
> · I think we need to follow the approved process and send this
> liaison from IEEE 802
>
> o Here is link to the process,
> https://mentor.ieee.org/802.19/dcn/14/19-14-0089-01-0000-liaison-approval-process.pptx
>
> o We can run a EC email ballot with an early close. We should be able to
> get the EC approval quickly.
>
> · My comment on the content is related to the use of the term
> “consensus” It is my recollection that at the 3GPP workshop the RAN Chair
> said that 3GPP would address comments from all stakeholders. I do not
> recall any statement on the organizations “reaching consensus” and I do not
> know how that would be done anyways. So I made a few edits accordingly.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve
>
>