Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
And if one happened to click on the link, the voting page is also unclear. 8-( see attached. On 8/7/2017 10:07 AM, Stephen [kiwin] PALM wrote:
These types of email need to clearly indicate 802.19 in the subject On 8/6/2017 9:00 PM, IEEE-SA wrote:From: "Tuncer Baykas" <tbaykas@xxxxxxxxx>, "Tuncer Baykas" <tbaykas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: undisclosed-recipients:; Subject: Reminder - ePoll 'The IEEE 802.15.3f coexistence assurance (CA) document' You are cordially invited to comment and vote on ePoll 'The IEEE 802.15.3f coexistence assurance (CA) document'. The question is as follows: Do you approve the IEEE 802.15.3f coexistence assurance (CA) document? https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/17/15-17-0267-00-003f-amendment-802-15-3f-coexistence-assurance-document.pdf Remember that voting on CA documents is required to maintain WG voting rights. 7 days to go, polling closes on 14-Aug-2017. https://mentor.ieee.org/802.19/poll-vote?p=26700008&t=26700008
Attachment:
802.15f.gif
Description: GIF image