RE: stds-80220-ch-models: Traffic Models Conference Call: Details and Agenda
It is true that UK summer time is different from GMT/UTC.
I used the following web site to check the GMT/UTC
time. So I do not understand who is supposed to
add an hour.
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=7&month=8&year=
2003&hour=12&min=0&sec=0&p1=179
In any case, if you are not sure, please
verify your time w.r.t. to US EDT.
- Shankar
-----Original Message-----
From: Marianna Goldhammer [mailto:marianna.goldhammer@alvarion.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 7:11 AM
To: Shankaranarayanan,N K (Shankar); stds-80220-ch-models@ieee.org
Subject: RE: stds-80220-ch-models: Traffic Models Conference Call:
Details and Agenda
Hi,
Due to summer time, the actual U.K. time is different from GMT time. Add
one hour for the mentionned times.
Marianna
-----Original Message-----
From: shankar@research.att.com [mailto:shankar@research.att.com]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 6:26 PM
To: stds-80220-ch-models@ieee.org
Subject: stds-80220-ch-models: Traffic Models Conference Call: Details
and Agenda
To: Traffic Model Subgroup
From: Editor
We have a conference call scheduled for August 7.
The call-in details are:
Date: Aug 7 2003 (Thursday)
Time: 12:00 AM to 1:30 PM US Eastern Daylight Time
(4:00 PM to 5:30 PM GMT/UTC)
Dial-in Number(s): +1 (734) 414-0269
Participant Code: 279728
Thanks to AT&T for providing the teleconference bridge.
Agenda:
1) Scope of Traffic Models Group
2) Usage Scenarios
3) List of Traffic Types
4) General modeling approach:
- uplink/asymmetry modeling
- modeling of aggregate users
to serve as background load
- No (?) TCP or IP packet sizes
5) Web-browsing traffic model
6) Traffic models for other applications (time permitting)
Items 1,2,3 were discussed in the July meeting.
Please see:
a) C802.20-03/66 - Traffic Models draft document
b) C802.20-03/73 - Traffic Models discussion July 23
c) Attached ppt - Informal Traffic Models discussion
July 24. (See in "Notes" view. There are comments
and results of "show of hands" informal polling
about traffic models approach and usage scenarios)
We already seem to have consensus and there are
no objections. We will discuss this again in
the call, and freeze items 1,2,3 so that we do
not have to re-open this issue.
There already is a consensus trend re. how we
are likely to proceed. There are illustrative
traffic models in the draft document.
In item 4, we want to capture any views that
are contradictory to the general trend. If there aren't
any, the later discussions will be
about details of each traffic type.
- N. K. Shankar
Editor
This mail passed through mail.alvarion.com
************************************************************************
****
********
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
computer viruses.
************************************************************************
****
********
This mail was sent via mail.alvarion.com
************************************************************************
************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
computer viruses.
************************************************************************
************