| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi All:
I applaud the effort to define a data rate requirement in Section 41. in terms of a sustained average. However, a sustainable throughput is a function of the peak burst rate, user environment (Ped A, Ped B, etc.), propagation conditions, fading conditions, RF network design, user distribution, etc. For a minimum throughput (i.e. sustained data rate) requirement to have meaning, it is necessary to state specifically all of these conditions - a very difficult task.
Isn't it more straightforward - and less controversial - to specify a peak burst rate per sector and then state a maximum allowed degradation in data rate (or Eb/Io penalty) for different degradation factors?
.
Joseph Cleveland
Director, Systems & Standards
Wireless Systems Lab
Samsung Telecommunications America
Richardson, TX 75081
(O) 972-761-7981 (M) 214-336-8446 (F) 972-761-7909