Hi, everyone, 
    
     
    Below are my 
    two-cents on the issue of the repeaters.
     
    
      - The use of 
      repeaters is a performance enhancement issue. In some situations, 
      repeaters make sense. While in others, there are alternative ways as well. 
      A mandatory requirement seems too strong. 
      
 - The impact on the 
      AI is subject to investigation. It may be a little too early to conclude 
      that the system has to support huge delay or delay spread. 
      
 
     
    Best,
     
    Junyi 
    Li
     
    -----Original 
    Message-----
From: Humbert, 
    John J [NTWK SVCS] [mailto:JHumbe01@sprintspectrum.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 2:11 
    PM
To: 
    stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: RE: stds-80220-requirements: 
    FW: 802.20 Requirements - Repeaters
     
    Joanne 
    et al., 
     
    Support for the use 
    of repeaters needs to be a mandatory requirement because operators need to 
    have this tool in their tool box to economically provide in-building 
    coverage and in lightly populated areas.  If you recall from the 
    presentation in Singapore that KTF uses allot more repeaters than base 
    stations in their network. The same trend is also occurring in the US. 
    
     
    The 
    impact on the AI is that the system has to support larger delay's and delay 
    spreads. 
     
    
    John J. 
    Humbert 
    
6220 Sprint Parkway 
    
Mailstop KSOPHD0504 - 
    5D276 
Overland Park, KS 
    66251-6118 
PCS (816) 
    210-9611 
 
    -----Original 
    Message-----
From: Joanne 
    Wilson [mailto:joanne@arraycomm.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 11:10 
    PM
To: Humbert, John J 
    [NTWK SVCS]; stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: RE: stds-80220-requirements: 
    FW: 802.20 Requirements - Repeaters
     
    
    
    
    It's 
    not clear to me the AI design implications of the changes you have 
    made.  However,."should support" implies that
 
    
    support for 
    repeaters is optional.  Changing to "must not preclude" makes it a 
    mandatory requirement.  This change,
 
    
    at 
    least to me, doesn't clarify the rationale so much as changes requirement 
    itself.  I support maintaining the previous wording of the requirement 
    until we have a better understanding of the implications of the change and 
    the rationale for such.
 
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
-----Original 
    Message-----
From: 
    owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org 
    [mailto:owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Humbert, John J [NTWK 
    SVCS]
Sent: Thursday, 
    October 16, 2003 1:28 AM
To: 
    stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: stds-80220-requirements: FW: 
    802.20 Requirements - Repeaters
 
    
       
      Current 
      Text
      Support 
      for the use of Repeaters (Open)
      The system should 
      support the use of repeaters
      Proposed 
      Text
      The AI must not preclude the 
      use of repeaters or reflectors to bypass obstructions and extend cell 
      coverage.
       
      Rational
      1) This text clarifies the 
      rational given at the meeting in Singapore 
      John J. 
      Humbert
      6220 Sprint 
      Parkway
      Mailstop KSOPHD0504 - 
      5D276
      Overland Park, KS 
      66251-6118
      PCS (816) 
      210-9611