Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Jheroen Dorenbosch
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Joanne Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 4:24 PM
To: Shively, David; stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: RE: stds-80220-requirements: Spectral Efficiency (4.1.2)
Dave,It seems to me that the guardband requirements that you mentioned are probably that whichwas needed to meet the spectral mask associated with a given frequency allocation. Those are regulatorymatters that are outside of the purview of 802.20 to set and impossible for us to know without explicitknowledge of the market and band of deployment. For the purpose of defining the spectral efficiencyof the air interface, I believe it should be done based solely on the technology itself. In your example,you cite cdma2000 as having several different carrier bandwidths depending on the number of carriersdeployed and the allocation block size. Based on that, I don't see how one could make a valid assessmentof cdma2000's spectral efficiency. The PCS example may just be a deployment issue -- in a 5 MHzblock assignment they were able to deploy three 1.25 MHz carriers with 625 kHz guardbands on the edges.A good test case would then be to ask how many carriers could be deployed in a 10 MHz block assignment.My guess (one of the cdma2000 suppliers or operators could provide a more definitive answer) is thatthey could deploy more than 6 carriers -- in fact, probably 7 carriers with 625 kHz guardbands on theedges. In that case, by your method the cdma2000 carrier bandwidth would be about 2.14 MHz and not2.5 MHz..All this is to say that I think the guardband issue, at least with respect to adjacent block protection,completely muddies the calculation of the spectral efficiency for the air interface.Regarding UMTS, it was my understanding that ETSI had a specific work item to modify the UMTSair interface so that it could be deployed with the US PCS allocation in a 5 MHz block size. Again,someone from that community can correct me if that was not the case.Best regards,Joanne Wilson-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Shively, David
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:59 PM
To: stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: RE: stds-80220-requirements: Spectral Efficiency (4.1.2)You are correct that my intention is to define a way to evaluate spectral efficiency in a consistent manner.In the case of cdma2000, the individual channels can be placed directly adjacent to one another but thereis still a required guard band on either end of these channels. For 1900 MHz systems, the guard bandon each end is typically 625 kHz, for a total of 1.25 MHz. Thus, for a single cdma2000 carrier the totalspectrum requirement is 0.625 kHz + 1.25 MHz + 0.625 kHz = 2.5 MHz. For 2 carriers, the totalspectrum requirement is 3.75 MHz and for 3 carriers the total is 5 MHz. As you noted, the requirementmay be less at 450 MHz but there is still a clear requirement for some guard bands and this would impactthe calculation of spectral efficiency.For UMTS, the chip rate is 3.84 Mcps so the basic bandwidth requirement is commonly quoted as3.84 MHz. This would be the -3 dB bandwidth or, rather, the equivalent noise bandwidth.I do not know what you refer to in terms of modifications for the US PCS bands. The 3GPP standardsdo include the definitions and specifications for the 5 MHz frequency blocks that are part of the bandplanfor the US PCS bands. The 3.84 Mcps carrier completely fits into the 5 MHz block since there is "extra"space on either side.The bottom line is that the spectral efficiency calculations should be done as consistently as possible.From a network operator's perspective, what interests me is what spectrum efficiency can I get in acertain amount of deployed spectrum (including guard bands).The alternative approach would be do use only the carrier bandwidth without any guard bands. However,in this case, for example, the UMTS bandwidth would be 3.84 MHz rather than 5 MHz.David Shively-----Original Message-----
From: Joanne Wilson [mailto:joanne@arraycomm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 12:38 AM
To: Shively, David; stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: RE: stds-80220-requirements: Spectral Efficiency (4.1.2)Dave,In principle, I agree with your underlying premise which I believe is that all proposals should state their overallbandwidth requirements in a consistent way. However, I don't think your example is quite correct. For example,I know that three cdma2000 carriers can be deployed in less than 2x5 MHz of spectrum (e.g. cdma450 deploymentswhich I believe are in about 2x4.5 MHz blocks) but W-CDMA cannot be deployed in less than 2x5 MHz and in fact,I understand that it had to be modified to be deployable in the US PCS bands that are multiples of 2x5 MHz block sizes. So,I don't believe that the 5 MHz W-CDMA channel bandwidth includes guardbands.I believe it would be impossible to determine what would be the needed guardbands for protection of adjacent block licensees.I think it would be make sense to include whatever spacing would be needed between multiple carriers in a singledeployment.If you agree, how about the following approach?:"The network wide bandwidth is the total spectrum in use by the unique carriers deployed in the network, including any
required spacing between carriers."Agree?Best regards,Joanne-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Shively, David
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 4:06 PM
To: stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: RE: stds-80220-requirements: Spectral Efficiency (4.1.2)
Regarding these definitions, it should be clearly understood whether
or not guard bands are accounted for in the calculation of spectral
efficiency. For UMTS (W-CDMA), the channel is usually quoted as being
5 MHz wide. In this case the guard bands have been included. However,
for cdma2000 1X (and IS-95) the channel is usually quoted as being
1.25 MHz wide which does not include the necessary guard bands.I propose the following:
Network Wide Bandwidth: The network wide bandwidth is the total spectrum in
use by the unique carriers deployed in the network, including any
required guard bands.
Best regards,
David Shively
-----------------------------------------------------------
Dr. David Shively
Cingular Wireless
5565 Glenridge Connector, Mail Stop 950
Atlanta, GA 30342
Phone: 404 236 5909
Mobile: 404 285 5731
FAX: 404 236 5949
email: david.shively@cingular.com
pager: dshively@imcingular.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Humbert, John J [NTWK SVCS] [mailto:JHumbe01@sprintspectrum.com]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 12:08 PM
To: stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Cc: mike@arraycomm.com
Subject: stds-80220-requirements: Spectral Efficiency (4.1.2)
Below is the latest version of the text that was developed at the Plenary in Albuquerque along with a list of the open issues for this section.
* 4.1.2 System Spectral Efficiency (b/s/Hz/sector)
* The system spectral efficiency of the 802.20 air interface shall be quoted for the case of a three sector baseline configuration [Footnote 1]. It shall be computed in a loaded multi-cellular network setting, which shall be simulated based on the methodology established by the 802.20 evaluation criteria group. It shall consider among other factors a minimum expected data rate/user and/or other fairness criteria, and percentage of throughput due to duplicated information flow. The values shall be quoted on a b/s/Hz/sector basis. The system spectral efficiency of the 802.20 air interface shall be greater than X b/s/Hz/sector.* Footnote 1: Since the base configuration is only required for the purpose of comparing system spectral efficiency, proposals may submit deployment models over and beyond the base configuration.
* Definition:
* System spectral efficiency - System spectral efficiency is defined as the ratio of the aggregate throughput (bits/sec) to all users in the system divided by the network wide bandwidth (Hz) and divided by the number of sectors in the system.* Aggregate Throughput: Aggregate throughput is defined as the total throughput to all users in the system (user payload only).
* Network Wide Bandwidth:The network wide bandwidth is the total spectrum in use by the unique carriers deployed in the network.
* Open items
- Single value vs. multiple for uplink and downlink
- X bits/sec/Hz [note 1 b/s/Hz -or- downlink > 2 b/s/Hz/(cell or sector?) @ 3km/hr ;uplink > 1 b/s/Hz/(cell or sector?) @ 3 km/hr].- Actual values of spectral efficiency at higher speeds
- TDD/FDD
John J. Humbert
6220 Sprint Parkway
Mailstop KSOPHD0504 - 5D276
Overland Park, KS 66251-6118
PCS (816) 210-9611