The size of the guard bands is dependant
on the technology selection and the regulatory environment, thus it is not possible
to define the size of the guard bands at this point.  The only thing that
we can do is assume that the guard bands are located outside the proposed blocks
sizes. 
 
Closing out the section on Block Sizes
does not preclude a discussion on channel BW’s.
 
John J. Humbert 
6220 Sprint Parkway 
Mailstop KSOPHD0504 - 5D276 
Overland Park, KS 66251-6118 
PCS (816) 210-9611 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Shively, David
[mailto:david.shively@cingular.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003
2:48 PM
To: Humbert, John J
 [NTWK SVCS]; stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: Requirements document -
Block size and spectral efficiency
 
Hi John, 
I noticed on your spreadsheet that the section on
block size is 
due to be closed.  However,
several of my comments on spectral 
efficiency are also applicable to
the issue of block size.  It 
seems that there are still several
differing opinions on the 
block/channel requirements. 
This issue was also addressed in the 
Albuquerque meeting by Lucent
(contribution #105) and also by 
Sprint (contribution #112r1).
I am still unclear whether or not the block sizes
indicated 
(e.g. 1.25 MHz and 5 MHz) include
the necessary guard bands.  For 
example, if a block size of 5 MHz
is used does this mean that I 
can deploy this system in a 5 MHz
licensed spectrum block such 
as the US PCS D, E, and F blocks or
the C and D blocks in the 
recently announced Advanced
Wireless Services spectrum ?  If so, 
then clearly this 5 MHz block must
include the guardbands.  Or, does 
this mean the the actual RF carrier
is intended to occupy the entire 
5 MHz wide and extra guard bands
will be needed? 
What about 1.25 MHz blocks?  Does this mean the
actual RF carrier 
bandwidth is 1.25 MHz  or does
the 1.25 MHz block already include 
guard bands? 
If block size is used in the calculation of spectral
efficiency, 
then it should be done in a consistent
way.  Either use a block size 
that includes the guard bands or
use the applicable RF carrier 
bandwidth and include a definition
of how carrier bandwidth is 
calculated. 
Best regards, 
David Shively 
 
-----Original Message----- 
From: Humbert, John J [NTWK SVCS] [mailto:JHumbe01@sprintspectrum.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003
8:06 PM 
To:
stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org 
Subject: stds-80220-requirements:
Requirements doc status 11_12_03.xls 
 
Attached is an excel spreadsheet showing the status of
each section. 
There are a number of sections that
are pending closure because they 
were discussed at the Plenary
meeting or there has been no activity for 
more than 5 days.  
 <<Requirements doc
status 11_12_03.xls>>