Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: stds-80220-requirements: Cancel - Requirements call



Title: RE: stds-80220-requirements: Cancel - Requirements call

I agree with Scott.

Joseph Cleveland

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Migaldi Scott-W10265

Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:57 PM
To: 'Robert D. Love'; Humbert, John J [NTK]; stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: RE: stds-80220-requirements: Cancel - Requirements call



I do not think this would be a good idea. Since the meeting has already been published many of us have made travel arrangements to be there in time for an afternoon session.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Robert D. Love

Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 13:49
To: Humbert, John J [NTK]; stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Subject: Re: stds-80220-requirements: Cancel - Requirements call



John, would it make sense to schedule an ad-hoc meeting of the Requirements Group on Monday morning 8:00 - 10:00am to get a jump start in resolving issues that are still open going into the March meeting.  I have been in touch with Face-to-Face Events and was told that meeting rooms for small groups (<50) are still available for Monday morning.

Best regards,

Robert D. Love
President, LAN Connect Consultants
7105 Leveret Circle     Raleigh, NC 27615
Phone: 919 848-6773       Mobile: 919 810-7816
email: rdlove@ieee.org          Fax: 208 978-1187
----- Original Message -----
From: "Humbert, John J [NTK]" <JHumbe01@sprintspectrum.com>
To: <stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:47 AM
Subject: stds-80220-requirements: Cancel - Requirements call


Today's conference call is cancelled, however I would encourage everyone to review revision 11r and post alternatives for each section to the reflector along with a rational. The focus CG over the next few weeks needs to be on developing no more that 4 alternatives for each section that the WG can consider at the next meeting.

I am expecting the person who posts an alternative for a particular section on the reflector to pull together a power point slide presentation for the March meeting that summarizes the current text and the debate on the reflector.

SRD version 11r1 can be found at http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/20/Drop_Box.htm.