Re: stds-80220-requirements: Cancel - Requirements call
Dan, your comments reflect my concerns. However, I think we owe it to John,
the Requirements Document editor, to make a last attempt at obtaining group
consensus for a base document. John told me that he would like to gain
consensus for a base document at the March meeting and I told him that I
would support his effort to do this. Notwithstanding my support in this
attempt, I am uncertain that we will be able to succeed taking that path.
That said, if we take your advise and strive for consensus building, true
professionalism, and compromise, we may be able to reach that goal at our
March meeting.
Best regards,
Robert D. Love
President, LAN Connect Consultants
7105 Leveret Circle Raleigh, NC 27615
Phone: 919 848-6773 Mobile: 919 810-7816
email: rdlove@ieee.org Fax: 208 978-1187
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gal, Dan (Dan)" <dgal@lucent.com>
To: "'Robert D. Love'" <rdlove@ieee.org>; "Humbert, John J [NTK]"
<JHumbe01@sprintspectrum.com>; <stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 4:47 PM
Subject: RE: stds-80220-requirements: Cancel - Requirements call
>
> Bob,
>
> I appreciate your good intentions, but I believe that the open issues are
fundamental and need to be discussed and agreed upon in the presence (and
hopefully the active participation) of the entire working group. I sense
that the Requirements CG has reached a dead-end and has become
dysfunctional. In the interest of moving the work forward, we need to
conduct a section-by-section review by the working group. The review should
be an intensive interactive process that would strive for consensus text
building. Such a process requires true professionalism and compromise making
and should be allowed to get as much time as it takes.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Migaldi Scott-W10265 [mailto:W10265@motorola.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 2:57 PM
> To: 'Robert D. Love'; Humbert, John J [NTK];
stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
> Subject: RE: stds-80220-requirements: Cancel - Requirements call
>
>
>
> I do not think this would be a good idea. Since the meeting has already
been published many of us have made travel arrangements to be there in time
for an afternoon session.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-80220-requirements@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of
Robert D. Love
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 13:49
> To: Humbert, John J [NTK]; stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
> Subject: Re: stds-80220-requirements: Cancel - Requirements call
>
>
>
> John, would it make sense to schedule an ad-hoc meeting of the
Requirements Group on Monday morning 8:00 - 10:00am to get a jump start in
resolving issues that are still open going into the March meeting. I have
been in touch with Face-to-Face Events and was told that meeting rooms for
small groups (<50) are still available for Monday morning.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Robert D. Love
> President, LAN Connect Consultants
> 7105 Leveret Circle Raleigh, NC 27615
> Phone: 919 848-6773 Mobile: 919 810-7816
> email: rdlove@ieee.org Fax: 208 978-1187
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Humbert, John J [NTK]" <JHumbe01@sprintspectrum.com>
> To: <stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:47 AM
> Subject: stds-80220-requirements: Cancel - Requirements call
>
>
> Today's conference call is cancelled, however I would encourage everyone
to review revision 11r and post alternatives for each section to the
reflector along with a rational. The focus CG over the next few weeks needs
to be on developing no more that 4 alternatives for each section that the WG
can consider at the next meeting.
>
> I am expecting the person who posts an alternative for a particular
section on the reflector to pull together a power point slide presentation
for the March meeting that summarizes the current text and the debate on the
reflector.
>
> SRD version 11r1 can be found at
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/20/Drop_Box.htm.