RE: contributions for upcoming May 2004 meeting - ARID
Stephen, thanks your kindly comments on this work.
I agree what you said, this solution can be applied
for several wireless environments and I really hope it
will be expanded to related WG as you stated 802.11
WIEN SG.
I am deeply considering what approach is more general
as 802.21 guys indicated and also waiting for various
comments/feedbacks on this work.
> However, the way that this information is communicated, be
> that over a 802.11, 802.16, other air interface will be
> technology specific and should really be discussed within the
> WG in charge of standardising that technology.
Regarding this comment, could you explain it
more detail ?
Thanks
- Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
- Mobile Platform Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: McCann, Stephen [mailto:stephen.mccann@roke.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 12:36 AM
> To: 'S. Daniel Park'; 'stds-802-21'
> Cc: ajayrajkumar@LUCENT.COM
> Subject: RE: contributions for upcoming May 2004 meeting - ARID
>
>
> Daniel,
> This is a very interesting issue, and I think it may be
> applicable to more than one WG.
>
> The information that you would want to make available at the
> APs (e.g. the ARID) is something that would seem to fit
> within the scope of 802.21, where the benefits of having a
> generic identifier that can be used over different
> technologies to support this L2/L3 handover distinction and
> what format this information should take can be discussed.
>
> However, the way that this information is communicated, be
> that over a 802.11, 802.16, other air interface will be
> technology specific and should really be discussed within the
> WG in charge of standardising that technology.
>
> Within 802.11 this issue would be welcome within 802.11 WIEN
> SG.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Stephen
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: S. Daniel Park [mailto:soohong.park@SAMSUNG.COM]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 11:50 AM
> > To: ajayrajkumar@LUCENT.COM; 'stds-802-21'
> > Cc: 'S. Daniel Park'
> > Subject: RE: contributions for upcoming May 2004 meeting - ARID
> >
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> >
> > At the previous meeting on March, I presented one issue
> > which dealt
> > with unclear handover indication between L2 and L3 and
> > this solution
> > defined a new ARID (Access Router ID) into the beacon to
> > distinguish
> > L2 handover from L3 handover. If different ARID, it means subnet
> > change, then L3 handover is
> > performed.
> >
> > The subject was as below:
> > Awareness of the handover to be distinguished from a L2 or L3.
> >
> > I remember that chair and some guys required more general
> > solution
> > to solve this problem in the 802.11 and they worried
> > about the newly
> > defined value into the current 802.11 beacon, however I am still
> > wondering how we can solve this ambiguous operation
> > without 802.11
> > spec. extension like ARID or similar value.
> >
> > So I am open to listen some comments/views on this issue.
> >
> > My major question is that
> > [1] Do I have to propose this solution to the 802.11 WG
> > since this
> > problem is originated from the 802.11 spec. ?
> >
> > or
> >
> > [2] Is this 802.21 WG is right place to deat with this issue ?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > - Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
> > - Mobile Platform Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics.
>
> --
>
> Visit our website at www.roke.co.uk
>
> Registered Office: Roke Manor Research Ltd, Siemens House,
> Oldbury, Bracknell, Berkshire. RG12 8FZ
>
> The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments
> is confidential to Roke Manor Research Ltd and must not be
> passed to any third party without permission. This
> communication is for information only and shall not create or
> change any contractual relationship.
>
>