Action item For 01/05 Meeting

["Carlton, Alan G" <Alan.Carlton@INTERDIGITAL.COM>]

Assuming tomorrows meeting is going ahead. Here is an update to the slides 
as requested at the last conference call.

Best Regards 
Alan. 

 <<80221 Tuesday 0105 CC Input.ppt>>  

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Gupta, Vivek G [mailto:vivek.g.gupta@INTEL.COM] 
Sent:   Wednesday, December 29, 2004 1:31 PM
To:     stds-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject:        RE: ad hoc group on evaluation criteria: Draft Down Selection Process document

|-----Original Message-----
|From: Reijo Salminen [mailto:reijo.salminen@seesta.com]
|Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:17 PM
|To: Gupta, Vivek G
|Subject: RE: ad hoc group on evaluation criteria: Draft Down Selection
|Process document
|
|Vivek,
|
|You're right - let's see the more detailed proposals first. There will
|probably be a lively debate around IS in general, we have not had that
|discussion yet.
|
|BR, Reijo
|
|-----Original Message-----
|From: Gupta, Vivek G [mailto:vivek.g.gupta@intel.com]
|Sent: 28. joulukuuta 2004 21:11
|To: Reijo Salminen
|Subject: RE: ad hoc group on evaluation criteria: Draft Down Selection
|Process document
|
|Reijo,
|
|Thanx for your comments.
|In general, for any information that is included in Information Service
|(IS), there needs to be some explanation as to how it is intended to be
|used.
|The same goes for Channel models as well.
|
|I am not sure the checklist is an appropriate place to mandate what
|should be explicitly included in the (IS). Let's see what folks come up
|with in detailed proposals.
|
|Best Regards
|-Vivek
|
|

80221 Tuesday 0105 CC Input.ppt