RE: [802.21] draft submissions for March 2005 meeting
Ajay
I appreciate your efforts representing .21 at IETF. It would help in liaison later on. On the point of preparing differentiation/similarities slide, I am missing how it helps. If 2 proposals are leading for two different solution (Captured by 2 harmonized proposals) is it necessary to always come up with one way of solving the problem?
It would be great if you elaborate it little more.
Thanks and BR
Yogesh Bhatt
Global Standards - Mobile Devices
Motorola Inc;
600 North U.S. Highway 45,
Libertyville, IL 60048 U.S.A
Tel: +1-847-523-0126
Fax: +1-847- 523 - 5660
SMS: +18476680334@tmomail.net
email: yogeshbhatt@motorola.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG [mailto:owner-stds-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Ajay Rajkumar
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 12:01 AM
To: STDS-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802.21] draft submissions for March 2005 meeting
Folks,
The draft submissions for the proposals that remain active are in. Sorry for the delay in posting these drafts. I had been attending IETF meetings where fortunately or unfortunately I did not have any email access and these have been sitting in my inbox!
Offline harmonization effort has yielded results and currently all active proposals have merged into two proposals. To continue on this path of harmonization, I would want both proposal groups to prepare a slide each enumerating their differences and similarities.
This would facilitate further discussion in two ways. In my view, there are some open issues that may be common to both proposals at hand and would help resolve/clarify these issues at the WG level. Besides, this would also help further harmonization during the March Plenary.
See you all in Atlanta.
Regards,
-ajay