Re: RE: [802.21] Question on policy raised today
HI DJ,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Johnston, Dj" <dj.johnston@intel.com>
Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 10:32 pm
Subject: RE: [802.21] Question on policy raised today
>
> Greg,
> Yes. It might be better to define such a service rather than define
> andrequire it. Especially if there exists a L3 that doesn't happen to
> understand .21 event indications. Since we haven't standardized them
> yet, that would be all TCP/IP stacks today.
Yes, I guess I meant required to implement,
optional to use.
Greg