Hi Vivek and Stefano,
[Vivek G Gupta]
Many of the existing media specific technologies
already do this in some form. For example 802.11k provides access to link
layer measurements like Bit Rate, BER, etc. that you mention above. Other
media specific technologies also have a provision for something
similar.
Given that, do we need any additional methods/primitives or
capabilities from 802.21 for above?
[[Stefano] ] I
think the answer is completely depending on the use scenarios. Let's assume a
3GPP network operator owns multiple accesses, such as 802.11 and 802.16 in
addition to the 3GPP specific access networks. Let's assume the operator is
interested in having network controlled HO e.g. for load sharing or other
reasons that require stricter control that the one granted by simply
controlling the policies in the terminal used to decide HO between
technologies. In such case, it may be difficult in practical implementations
to have an MME function in the network that relies on existing L2
technology-specific to collect the information. it pretty much implies a tight
IW of the various radio interfaces/ANs at L2, that may not be that easy to
implement nor that acceptable to 3GPP operators/vendors. In such scenario,
using 802.21 at "L3 and above" to allow reporting of information to the MIHF
in an MME that is used to control inter-technology HO may be an easy and clean
way to!
go. I see this as a very relevant scenario for "L3 and
above" MIH.
=>
[Junghoon]
I tend to agree about the scenario that Stefano mentioned as
a general application of MIH.
However, I have some concern regarding the network-initiated
inter-technology handover.
To support not one or two mobile terminals, overloading of MIH
_handover_ control entity by enormous MIH events and commands...
IMO, it would be better to let a mobile terminal have a
brain about inter-technology handover decision.