RE: [802.21] Telecon April 27

["Gupta, Vivek G" <vivek.g.gupta@INTEL.COM>]

 

The 3GPP contribution we discussed in the telecon today does not have 802.21 mentioned anywhere.

It’s written more along the general lines of how 802.21 services can help in heterogeneous handovers in 3GPP networks, without directly referring to 802.21.

Believe that’s in line with most of the views we heard on the teleconference.

 

As for more discussion on this topic in May meeting, sure we can definitely allocate time for this in agenda.

However instead of just having ad hoc discussions, it would be more beneficial to have focused discussions around more thought out themes/presentations.

Contributions are sought for this topic for May meeting and depending on what’s submitted we can allocate suitable time for this discussion.

 

Best Regards

-Vivek

 

---

From: stds-802-21@ieee.org [mailto:stds-802-21@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Peretz Feder
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 9:44 AM
To: Srinivas.Sreemanthula@nokia.com
Cc: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802.21] Telecon April 27

 

Vivek, Srini:

A few issues here:

1) Not sure the 802.21 group had provided a  mandate to attach 802.21 name to any of these letters/contributions. Not sure I saw a motion for any of these, let alone approved motion.
2) Practically, if any of our members indicates this is coming from 802.21 he/she will fail to achieve the stated goal in 3GPP (which in my mind should be at best to provide same type of contribution that was accepted by 802.16g). So practically I will not advice it and the one to submit the 3GPP contributions better actually not be affiliated with 802.21.
3) If ((Srini is implying == after  (t => May) we may want to make it an official tone)) go to step 2


Peretz Feder

On 4/27/2006 11:12 AM, Srinivas Sreemanthula wrote:

Hi Vivek,

I wish we had time to discuss this in a F2F and have worded more carefully on what we would like to achieve in 3GPP. I think we should still do it in the May meeting.  While we are doing this, as Peretz suggested it would be better to provide as individual companies' view without using the 802.21 name. Soon after May meeting we could impart an official tone to this.

 

Regards,

Srini