Re: [802.21] About 3GPP SAE contribution
Qiaobing,
You're totally right.
I also do not want to spend our energy in looking at and discussing that kind of non-technical comments here.
More importantly, we need to focus in paying our energy by technical oriented manner.
Isn't it more preferable to find out a way to amend the suggested texts from 21-06-0615-00-0000-3GPP-S2-021278.doc
whenever and wherever feasible?
-Junghoon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Qiaobing Xie" <Qiaobing.Xie@motorola.com>
To: "Junghoon Jee" <jhjee@etri.re.kr>
Cc: <STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 2:31 AM
Subject: Re: [802.21] About 3GPP SAE contribution
>
> Hi, Junghoon,
>
> ...
>>>And my understanding is that the authors' decision to share this document with
>>>the group and asking for comments and feedback here is out of courtesy -
>>>they are not required to do it.
>>
>> Sure, however no one can say that it is redundant. :-)
>> IMO, it has a meaning and a good way to make progress.
>> Because 802.21 works need much cooperation from other IEEE 802 groups and SDOs,
>> the sharing and discussing and making comments are highly expected works
>> whenever 802.21 core agenda permits.
>
> I totally agree with you on this, the best way we can make progress is
> to share ideas with each other. But the reason I felt I'd like to remind
> the group that it's done out of the authors' courtesy is pretty simple:
>
> I saw most of the previous comments on Vivek's contribution were around
> some non-technical procedural issues and the fact is there should be no
> procedural issue of concern to 802.21 since the authors of the 3GPP
> contribution is not obliged to any 802.21 procedures. So we should not
> waste our time looking into the procedural issues here. Rather, I'd
> think the best way we can help the authors to improve the 3GPP
> contribution is to provide them with technical comments and feedback
> since we are the subject experts here.
>
> regards,
> -Qiaobing
>
>