Re: Re: [802.21] MIH Protocol Message Naming Issue
Hi Junghoon, Srini and all,
I also think that the MIH_*N2N*_HO_Candidate_**Commit** message plays an important role indicating the MN's movement to the Target PoS. If we delete it (or make it optional), the MIH procedure would lose integrality.
What about you?
Yan
>------------Original Message------------
>From: Junghoon Jee [mailto:jhjee@ETRI.RE.KR]
>Sent: 2007-03-09 10:48:00
>To: STDS-802-21 [STDS-802-21@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG]
>Subject: Re: [802.21] MIH Protocol Message Naming Issue
>Hi Srini again,
>
>Originally, I questioned about the missing MIH_*N2N*_HO_Candidate_**Commit**
>from the Serving PoS and Target PoS. This has a role of the final indication
>of the MN's movement from the Serving PoS to the Target PoS.
>
>Thoughts?
>
>Junghoon
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <Srinivas.Sreemanthula@nokia.com>
>To: <jhjee@ETRI.RE.KR>; <STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org>
>Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 9:34 PM
>Subject: RE: [802.21] MIH Protocol Message Naming Issue
>
>
>
>Hi Junghoon,
>We use MIH_N2N_HO_Query_resources for that.
>
>Regards,
>Srini
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Junghoon Jee [mailto:jhjee@ETRI.RE.KR]
>Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 1:45 AM
>To: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
>Subject: [802.21] MIH Protocol Message Naming Issue
>
>Hi all,
>
>There is a missing protocol message and its corresponding primitive from
>the current MIH protocol messages and primtives.
>In my understanding, the use of second word in the MIH Protocol and
>primitive was to denote the direction of them, like from MN to PoS,
>between PoSs and from PoS and MN.
>
>The current rule is like below:
>1. "MN" to denote that this message is originated from MN toward PoS.
>2. "Net" to denote that this message is originated from PoS toward MN.
>3. "N2N" to denote that this message is exchanged between PoSs.
>
>For an example, the word of "MN" from MIH_"MN"_HO_Candidate Query
>Request is to denote that this message is originated from MN toward the
>Serving PoS.
>
>However, currently we do not define the MIH_N2N_HO_Candidate_Query
>Request/Response even though that message is exchanged between Serving
>PoS and Target PoS.
>Moreover, the MIH_Network_Address_Information does not follow this rule.
>
>Any thoughts?
>
>Junghoon
-----------------------------------------
**********************************************************************
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from
HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address
is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way
(including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure,reproduction,
or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is
prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!
**********************************************************************