Thanks for your feedback. Actually I
have gone through all 3 drafts discussed at monami6 as well as draft-montavont-mobileip-mmi-01.txt
too.
Most of these drafts talks about the
scenarios and need one draft gives the option too but not solution.
Actually i am under process of writing
a draft for the solutions keeping few assumption in mind. I belive it should
be use full for VHO and MIH implementation.
Where we need to serve multiple address
on multiple interfaces.
Regards
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anurag Uxa
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( ) L&T Infotech Proprietary & Confidential
(+) L&T Infotech Confidential
( ) L&T Infotech Internal Use only
( ) General Business Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adnan Kiani <Adnan.Kiani@BRUNEL.AC.UK>
04/10/2007 07:21 PM
Please respond to
Adnan Kiani <Adnan.Kiani@BRUNEL.AC.UK>
To
STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
cc
Subject
[802.21]
Hello Anurag,
I agree with you that assigning a single Home Address to a multi interfaced
node is more advantageous than using multiple Home Addresses. This is due
to the fact that applications don't need to know the multiplicity of the
Home Addresses.
There is an internet draft http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-monami6-multiplecoa-02.txt
<https://owa1.brunel.ac.uk/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-monami6-multiplecoa-02.txt>
that discusses multiple Care-of-Addresses Registration with a single
Home Address. A Binding Unique Identification Number is used to identify
different care of addresses.
However, keep in mind that it is still an ietf draft and hasn't become
a standard.
Kind regards,
Adnan K. Kiani
________________________________
From: Anurag Uxa [mailto:Anurag.Uxa@LNTINFOTECH.COM]
Sent: 03 April 2007 12:34
To: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [802.21] Home Address
Dear All,
Greetings.
This is regarding multiple home address for a single end held device. I
have read few drafts on Analysis of Multihoming and issues also. Couldn't
catch up all the discussion at Mip6 mailing list regarding that too.
I would like to know, What is the solution we have taken up for HoA (Home
Address) for multiple Interfaces of a single device.
I would like to know if any thing come as a standard? As implementation
wise there is no issue to keep one address as HoA for All the interfaces
of Multi interface device. If there is no std. till now, I still feel keeping
multiple Home address for a single device is not a wise idea? --Pls comment
on this??
Regards
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anurag Uxa
Communication & Embedded systems
Larsen & Toubro Infotech Limited
# Plot No.25 - 30 EPIP 1st Phase Industrial Area,
Whitefield,Bangalore - 560066
Direct No: 080 - 55242030
GSM: 9886751340
Email Id : anurag.uxa@lntinfotech.com
www.lntinfotech.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( ) L&T Infotech Proprietary & Confidential
(+) L&T Infotech Confidential
( ) L&T Infotech Internal Use only
( ) General Business Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------