Re: [802.21] [FW: connection bet. action ID and TLV type value]
Hi, Miriam,
Miriam Tauil wrote:
> I'm referring to the message parameters. The same parameter in different
> messages can have a different TLV type.
This is based on the group decision of comments 3363 and 4396. In 4396,
the resolution includes "The Type values for each identifier are
assigned in the message description for each message. Do this for all
MIH Protocol messages and all MIH Protocol TLVs." 3363 accept-modify
contribution 21-07-0022-00-0000-MIH-message-new-form, which discusses
some advantage of defining parameter TLV within the corresponding message.
Essentially, the TLV type values now are assigned *within* each
message. This means that a) the same TLV may be assigned a different
value when it appears in different messages, and b) a particular value
may be used for different TLV in different message.
regards,
-Qiaobing
>
> I hope this clarifies my question.
> Thanks
>
> Miriam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Qiaobing Xie [mailto:Qiaobing.Xie@MOTOROLA.COM]
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 12:37 PM
> To: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [802.21] [FW: connection bet. action ID and TLV type value]
>
> Hello Miriam,
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was wondering if anybody can point me to the comment resolution or
>> contribution that led to the change in assignment of the different TLV
> type
>> values. I would be interested to look into the considerations for this
>> change.
>
> Which TLV values are you referring to here (we have IE types, message
> parameter types, etc.)?
>
> regards,
> -Qiaobing
>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Miriam
>>
>>
>> ----- End forwarded message -----
>>
>
>