Re: [802.21] TYPE_IE_SYSTEM_INFORMATION
Hi Jin,
My comments are inline.
Jin Lee wrote:
> Hi Kenichi,
>
> It is to provide system information of each link technology before handover.
> Please refer to 21-07-150-01(Issue 9) which was accepted last June ad-hoc.
> More comments are inline.
>
>
[Kenichi]
I see, I read it and understood the motivation of the new IE. Actually
I haven't attended the June ad-hoc meeting.
> Thanks,
> -Jin
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kenichi Taniuchi" <ktaniuchi@TARI.TOSHIBA.COM>
> To: <STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 3:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [802.21] TYPE_IE_SYSTEM_INFORMATION
>
>
>
>> There is no data type definition for DCD&UCD, SIB, SYSTEM_PARAMETERS.
>> If the contributor knows the assumed data type, please let me know.
>>
> [Jin] Do you mean we need to define the data type each PARAMETERS in the IE? Here's my suggestion.
> For example, DCD may include Downlink burst profile, BS EIRP, DL Frequency, TTG, RTG , Frame Duration, etc.
> UCD may include Frequency, Uplink burst profile, Ranging CDMA codes, etc.
> SIB may contain CELL_ID, CHANNEL_ID , FREQUENCY_CODE, etc.
> SYSTEM_PARAMETERS may cover PILOT_PN, SID, NID, BASE_ID, BASE_CLASS, etc.
>
>
[Kenichi]
Based on your comment, I would like to know the format of
DCD, UCD, SIB, SYSTEM_PARAMETERS after the column of PARAMETERS in
P191,D5.2.
The format will need recursive definition like DOWN_BURST_PROFILE.
For example :
DCD_AND_UCD is SEQUENCE (DOWNLINK_BURST_PROFILE, BS_EIRP,
..,RANGING_CDMA_CODE)
DOWNLINK_BURST_PROFILE is INTEGER(x)
...
>> Regards,
>> Kenichi
>>
>> Kenichi Taniuchi wrote:
>>
>>> I found a new IE in page 171, Annex A, TYPE_IE_POA_SYSTEM_INFORMATION.
>>> I would like to understand about the usage of the IE and also actual
>>> binary encoding for updating Basic Schema.
>>>
> [Jin] Can you articulate your question about binary encoding again?
> I would welcome your comments if we need to work on this.
>
>
[Kenichi]
Why NETWORK_TYPE is in SYSTEM_INFORMATION again even it is in
TYPE_IE_NETWORK_TYPE ? ( I could guess what's your answer though..)
What's the contains of MAC_ADDRESS in SYSTEM_INFORMATION ?
If it's AP's ,then it's not needed because it's already in
TYPE_IE_POA_MAC_ADDRESS.
>>> Regards,
>>> Kenichi
>>>
>>>