Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Dear all, The current draft says that “Any messages exchanged between two MIHF must be integrity and reply protected over secure transport.” But the authentication between two MIHF is not discussed. I propose to add the following objective to the list defined in the document http://ieee802.org/21/doctree/2007-01_meeting_docs/21-07-0024-00-0000-Security_Issues_in_Transition.ppt: Investigate authentication, confidentiality and reliability issues with reference to communication between MIHF: Identify use cases and trust model; Investigate Key Hierarchy-based approach; Investigate Authentication-based approach. Please, find more detailed considerations in the attached file. Best regards, Maryna Michael G Williams a écrit : > > Colleagues, > > Please vote as the letter ballot is closing on the 29th (this Friday) > > For the July meeting, there has been discussion of forming a study > group related to MIH security and general handover security (sort of > two topics) > > These appear to be the latest submissions on this effort: > > _http://ieee802.org/21/doctree/2007-03_meeting_docs/21-07-0085-01-0000-mih-security.ppt_ > _http://ieee802.org/21/doctree/2007-03_meeting_docs/21-07-0122-00-0000-Security_proposal.ppt_ > _http://ieee802.org/21/doctree/2007-03_meeting_docs/21-07-0127-00-0000-Hokey_802.21.ppt_ > > _http://ieee802.org/21/doctree/2007-01_meeting_docs/21-07-0024-00-0000-Security_Issues_in_Transition.ppt_ > > Are there any discussions people would like to have on the mailing > list about the potential study group? This is highly encouraged ;^) > > Best Regards, > Michael >
21-07-0201-00-0000-MIH security issues.ppt