Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802.21] Discussion thread for MIHF ID



I was suggesting to keep the concept of uniqueness as it is.
The comment was to add the clarifying text.  We did that during ad hoc.

regards,
-Subir

Michael G Williams wrote:
>  
>   
>> Michael,
>> Comments inline.
>>
>> regards,
>> -Subir
>>
>> Michael.G.Williams@nokia.com wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi Subir,
>>>
>>>  This thread is in response to valuable comments against the draft by
>>>       
>
>   
>>> Andrew Myles. He presented a large number of thoughtful and valuable 
>>> improvements to the spec. I don't think we should just ignore his 
>>> comment on MIHF ID and leave the draft the way it is now.
>>>   
>>>       
>>  Subir: I do not think we are ignoring any of Andrew's comments. 
>> Everyone agrees that  they are
>>   very valuable and we are trying to resolve it. I do not 
>> know how you get the impression that we
>>   are ignoring his comments.
>>     
>
> Your suggestion was to leave the draft as it is. That suggestion ignores
> Andrew's objection doesn't it?
>
> Regards,
> Michael
>