Re: [802.21] Discussion thread for MIHF ID
I was suggesting to keep the concept of uniqueness as it is.
The comment was to add the clarifying text. We did that during ad hoc.
regards,
-Subir
Michael G Williams wrote:
>
>
>> Michael,
>> Comments inline.
>>
>> regards,
>> -Subir
>>
>> Michael.G.Williams@nokia.com wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Subir,
>>>
>>> This thread is in response to valuable comments against the draft by
>>>
>
>
>>> Andrew Myles. He presented a large number of thoughtful and valuable
>>> improvements to the spec. I don't think we should just ignore his
>>> comment on MIHF ID and leave the draft the way it is now.
>>>
>>>
>> Subir: I do not think we are ignoring any of Andrew's comments.
>> Everyone agrees that they are
>> very valuable and we are trying to resolve it. I do not
>> know how you get the impression that we
>> are ignoring his comments.
>>
>
> Your suggestion was to leave the draft as it is. That suggestion ignores
> Andrew's objection doesn't it?
>
> Regards,
> Michael
>