RE: [802.21] Updated version of Montreal Closing Plenary Report
I really don’t see this co-relation and fail to see the rational for deleting the below bullets. In the past we have included key outcomes from session as part of the Closing Report. EC motions have also been included in Closing Report. Closing Reports are for benefit of everybody, even those who have not attended the meeting. Initially there was resistance to including any mention on MRPM and Revision PAR. Now we are down to few bullets.
-Vivek
-----Original Message-----
From: Subir Das [mailto:subir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 7:59 AM
To: STDS-802-21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Gupta, Vivek G
Subject: Re: [802.21] Updated version of Montreal Closing Plenary Report
Rev-2 was necessary to correctly reflect the items/discussions (per
meeting minutes) in the closing
plenary report.
regards,
-Subir
Gupta, Vivek G wrote:
>
> Hello Junghoon,
>
> This teleconference is on. Please plan to attend.
>
> I share your concerns regarding the closing report and don’t see the
> rational for these updates in rev-2, especially:
>
> - Deleting the bullet: “Offline discussions with several companies”
> from MRPM slide, as the MRPM members did have these discussions in
> Montreal.
>
> - Deleting the bullet: “Further discussions in teleconferences” from
> Revision PAR slide, since this was mentioned when ad hoc was announced.
>
> From my perspective these updates in rev-2 don’t have any impact
> whatsoever.
>
> Best Regards
>
> -Vivek
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* stds-802-21@xxxxxxxx [mailto:stds-802-21@xxxxxxxx] *On Behalf
> Of *???
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 21, 2009 2:33 PM
> *To:* Gupta, Vivek G; STDS-802-21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: Re: [802.21] Updated version of Montreal Closing
> Plenary Report
>
> So, what's the status of Revision PAR teleconference?
>
> Please clarify this so that 802.21 members could arrange their
> schedules accordingly.
>
> Also, who's in charge of controlling that closing report and what's
> the impact according to whether a specifc item is listed or not?
>
> Junghoon Jee
>
>
> -----원본 메시지-----
> *From:* "Gupta, Vivek G" <vivek.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxx>
> *From Date:* 2009-05-21 오후 9:38:38
> *To:* "STDS-802-21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <STDS-802-21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Cc:*
> *Subject:* Re: [802.21] Updated version of Montreal Closing Plenary Report
>
>
> http://mentor.ieee.org/802.21/dcn/09/21-09-0091-01-0000-updated-closing-plenary-report.ppt
>
> In the revision-1 that I had posted earlier the following updates were
> made:
>
> - Changed the presentation format from Powerpoint-2007 format to just
> Presentation format
>
> - Added slide on 802.21 Revision PAR Update and added information on
> Revision PAR Teleconference
>
> - Added update on MRPM PAR slide
>
> In revision-2 you seem to have:
>
> - Deleted the bullet ”Further discussion in teleconferences” from
> Revision PAR slide
>
> - Deleted the bullet “Offline discussions with several companies” from
> MRPM PAR slide
>
> - Deleted information on Revision PAR teleconference
>
> Anything else I missed?
>
> Thanks for these updates.
>
> -Vivek
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stds-802-21@xxxxxxxx [mailto:stds-802-21@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Subir Das
> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 4:14 PM
> To: STDS-802-21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Updated version of Montreal Closing Plenary Report
>
> I have updated the May Closing Plenary report and the new version is
>
> available at:
>
> https://mentor.ieee.org/802.21/dcn/09/21-09-0091-02-0000-updated-closing-plenary-report.ppt
>
> regards,
>
> -Subir
>