RE: [STDS-802-21] Discussion about PoS versus MGW
Agree with the PoS terminology.
Peretz Feder
-----Original Message-----
From: Yoshihiro Ohba [mailto:yoshihiro.ohba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:34 PM
To: STDS-802-21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-21] Discussion about PoS versus MGW
I agree with using PoS to denote the MIHF handling the single-radio
commands.
Yoshihiro Ohba
(2012/08/31 10:24), Charles E. Perkins wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Yesterday we had a discussion about using PoS to denote the
> MIHF handling the single-radio commands described in the
> current 802.21c documents.
>
> The existing terminology ("MGW") was picked to emphasize
> that the single-radio solution could be implemented without
> having to implement the previously specified MIH PoS commands.
>
> I think it would be better to avoid multiple terminologies for
> the same functional unit, which is always the PoS even if it is
> also called the MGW.
>
> On the teleconference, we decided to raise this issue on the
> 802.21 mailing list to get more discussion and perhaps consensus
> from the group.
>
> Comments will be appreciated.
>