Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Here are my notes from the call last week (9/28/11, approximately 10:05- 11:25 PST):
----------
On the call: Adam Healey, Arthur Marris, Brad Booth, Hugh Barrass, Matt Brown, Pedro Riviriego, Wael Diab, Mark Gustlin and Mike Bennett
Thanks to Hugh and Cisco for hosting the call.
Pedro presented "Energy Efficient 100G with Modular LPI"
Comments and Questions:
General discussion on latency. As latency increases tolerance decreases. There is a trade-off between latency and power savings
Some disagreement whether or not 3 lanes could be active (only one lane turned off)
Need to prove the assumption that the multi-lane approach would lower the transition time
Question as to whether or not there are any savings to to powering off FEXT cancellers.
We need more data center traffic for analysis. Traffic data is hard to get. Pedro has a script that will take a capture as input and output a text file with frame inter-arrival times ad frame sizes. Removing everything else may alleviate concerns about sharing the data.
Question - how fast is the LPI transition? What is the minimum wake time? fair amount of discussion but no definitive answer.
One thing many on the call agreed on was the need to avoid complexity. Don't want a new PCS. Some things may be able to be done in the PMA instead.
Discussed whether or not we should ask for an objective, and the advantages and disadvantages of doing so.
Discussed the use of IEEE P802.3bj Task Force Ad-Hoc in order to make sure discussion and material are available to anyone.
------------
Post meeting:
Next Steps:
Get data center traffic for analysis
Review Mark Gustlin's LPI presentation
Continue to build consensus for EEE for 100G Backplane and Twinaxial Copper Cable
Next Call - 10/20
Doodle poll for call before 10/28/2011
Attachment:
Energy_Efficient_100G_with_Modular_LPI.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document