Re: [802.3_100GCU] More comments on pre-draft 0.1

[Piers Dawe <piers.dawe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mike,

Good catch.

brown_02_0312.pdf slide 7 says "Many values are not marked as TBD but are intended only as examples of what could be done. These are highlighted in green and if this presentation is used as a baseline for an initial draft standard, they will be changed to TBD in the draft."

Slide 19 shows:
Loss at 6.88 GHz	15	32	dB
in green.

Piers

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Dudek [mailto:mike.dudek@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 18 May 2012 17:16
To: Piers Dawe; STDS-802-3-100GCU@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: More comments on pre-draft 0.1

I'm not suggesting your changes aren't good changes, however I don't think you can use dudek_03_0312 as a justification for changes to clause 94.   The dudek presentation does not address PAM4.

Mike Dudek  
QLogic Corporation
Senior Manager Signal Integrity
26650 Aliso Viejo Parkway
Aliso Viejo  CA 92656
949 389 6269 - office.
Mike.Dudek@xxxxxxxxxx



-----Original Message-----
From: Piers Dawe [mailto:piers.dawe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 8:42 AM
To: STDS-802-3-100GCU@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_100GCU] More comments on pre-draft 0.1

Adam,

Thank you for your hard work on the draft.  Please find some more comments.  The last one is the most important.

Thanks,

Piers