Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Is that a practice or spec question. The spec calls out SER0 as 1e-5. In practice that deserves answers from folks more experience than I.
From: Mike Dudek [mailto:mike.dudek@xxxxxxxxxx]
Maybe I should have asked this question on the call. I see that you are using 1e-5 for the BER with FEC for both NRZ and PAM4. I thought that PAM4 used higher
overhead to achieve a stronger FEC. What am I missing? Mike Dudek
QLogic Corporation Senior Manager Signal Integrity 26650 Aliso Viejo Parkway Aliso Viejo CA 92656 949 389 6269 - office. From: Mellitz, Richard
[mailto:richard.mellitz@xxxxxxxxx]
-----Original Appointment----- Scheduled Bridge
Thursday, October 25, 2012 4:00 PM US
Eastern Time 916-356-2663, Bridge: 2, Passcode: 2046222 ......................................................................................................................................... [!OC([1033])!] ......................................................................................................................................... Agenda, Review changes in COM based on DRAFT 1.2 Clause 93a, 93, and 94. COM comparison examples of a few selected channels for clause 93 and clause 94 with present Draft 1.2 COM parameters.
Review/catalog potential proposals for comments on draft 1.2 to related to COM. The meeting is an IEEE standards associated meeting. Please review the patent policy at the following site prior to the meeting
http://www.ieee802.org/3/patent.html If you haven’t already done so please advise me if you want further information on this. |