Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

[802.3_100GCU] Marking Bad FEC Codewords - Comment #269 on Draft 1.2 of 802.3bj

To: STDS-802-3-100GCU@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_100GCU] Marking Bad FEC Codewords - Comment #269 on Draft 1.2 of 802.3bj
From: Stephen Bates <Stephen.Bates@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:28:55 -0800
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-802-3-100GCU>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-802-3-100GCU>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-802-3-100GCU-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-3-100GCU-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-3-100GCU-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Reply-to: Stephen Bates <Stephen.Bates@xxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: Ac3IQNLckc8yrxssTmyq3dOFRnn4RwAB28PQ
Thread-topic: Marking Bad FEC Codewords - Comment #269 on Draft 1.2 of 802.3bj

Hi All

I would like to host a call to discuss some of the issues around comment #269 against draft 1.2 of the 802.3bj draft (the marking bad FEC block issue). After we discussed that comment in San Antonio some of your approached me with some concerns about the implementation cost of complying with this. If you are interested in being part of a call to discuss this issue, its implications and potential solutions please email me directly and I will include you on the invite.

Cheers

Stephen Bates, PhD, SMIEEE

Technical Advisor, CSTO

PMC-Sierra

Prev by Date: Re: [802.3_100GCU] FEC and error ratios.
Next by Date: [802.3_100GCU] FW: FEC and error ratios.
Previous by thread: [802.3_100GCU] FW: FEC and error ratios.
Next by thread: Re: [802.3_100GCU] FEC and error ratios.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread