Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Dear Colleagues – Thank you for the great progress we’ve made in comment resolution thus far! Looking ahead to next week… Topics recommended to defer: See slide 9 of
https://www.ieee802.org/3/ck/public/21_01/comagenda_3ck_05_0121.pdf
I recognize that each of these listed topics are valuable and the commenters put time into their analysis and proposal, but I ask if the task force would consider a neutral comment response such as: “This
comment proposes a change to the draft that does not address technical completeness. The commenter is invited to resubmit this comment during working group ballot.”
We intend to address each comment on its own and close using the above response, if the task force agrees in its deferral. Should we choose to have a technical discussion on the deferred comments, the TF will likely miss the WG submission deadline which means no WG ballot until May. March seems a long ways away, but remember,
we need to close comments, implement the adopted responses, and review that there aren’t any large issues remaining… And still pre-submit by March 5th. So I ask that as you consider this recommendation prior to Tuesday’s meeting; keep in mind the
larger project impact of opening each of these issues. To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-100GEL list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-100GEL&A=1 |