Re: [802.3_100GNGOPTX] Comments on the draft 5 criteria responses
Resuming my earlier message
There may be a challenge... Maintaining a coherent set of slides if too
many people chime in, so I am asking that revisions be communicated in the
document to ease management.
Sorry for the cut-off comment. I think we were breaking for lunch and I
hit <send> instead of <save draft>.
Dan
On 1/24/12 12:00 PM, "Daniel Dove" <ddove@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>Hi Piers,
>
>Thank you for taking the initiative to inject your questions/suggestions.
>
>I would request that other participants consider them, and work towards a
>common document that can garner broad support. We should seek
>simplification if possible, and try to make it sufficient without adding
>any more than is necessary.
>
>There may be a challenge
>
>Regards,
>
>Dan
>
>On 1/24/12 10:31 AM, "Piers Dawe" <piers.dawe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>All,
>>
>>To avoid too much wordsmithing within motion madness and so that we can
>>refine our documentation while we are here in person, I have made
>>comments and suggestions on the draft 5 criteria responses
>>http://ieee802.org/3/100GNGOPTX/public/jan12/dove_02_0112_NG100GOPTX.pdf
>>It's an editable file so that others can improve on it.
>>
>>Piers
>