Re: [802.3_100GNGOPTX] SMF Ad Hoc and MMF Ad Hoc
Thursdays are really bad for me, I would
prefer Tuesdays.
Petar Pepeljugoski
IBM Research
P.O.Box 218 (mail)
1101 Kitchawan Road, Rte. 134 (shipping)
Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
e-mail: petarp@xxxxxxxxxx
phone: (914)-945-3761
fax: (914)-945-4134
From:
Jeffery Maki <jmaki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
STDS-802-3-100GNGOPTX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:
02/10/2012 12:38 PM
Subject:
Re: [802.3_100GNGOPTX]
SMF Ad Hoc and MMF Ad Hoc
Hi,
Thursdays would be my preference
in general.
Jeff
From: Anslow, Peter [mailto:panslow@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 3:31 AM
To: STDS-802-3-100GNGOPTX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [802.3_100GNGOPTX] SMF Ad Hoc and MMF Ad Hoc
Mike, John,
I think that we could move
the calls to be 8:00 till 10:00 am Pacific on Tuesday if that suits everyone
better. The reason that we didn’t propose this is that there is
a P802.3bj call at 10:00 am Pacific on that day which we assumed some people
would want to attend.
http://www.ieee802.org/3/100GCU/email/msg00236.html
Does anyone have a problem
with moving our call to be 8:00 till 10:00 am Pacific on Tuesday? If
not I will move it.
John,
Yes, these are both Study
Group Ad Hoc meetings.
We will try to get the SG
web page updated to show the SMF Ad Hoc and the latest meeting as soon
as possible.
The goal of the SMF Ad Hoc
is to try to build consensus on the issues of:
·
Should an SMF objective
be added?
·
If so, what should that
objective be?
·
Can we establish adequate
5C responses for at least one (preferably more) solution to meet that objective?
Agendas for both Ad Hoc meetings
will be generated as soon as we can.
All,
If you have a presentation
you would like to make, then for the SMF call, please let me know
and for the MMF call let Jonathan know.
Thanks,
Pete Anslow |
Senior Standards Advisor
43-51 Worship Street |
London, EC2A 2DX, UK
Direct +44 2070 125535 |
From: Mike Peng Li [mailto:mpli@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 09 February 2012 21:46
To: Anslow, Peter; STDS-802-3-100GNGOPTX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Mike Peng Li
Subject: RE: SMF Ad Hoc and MMF Ad Hoc
Peter:
OIF day is next Wed (2/15),
and some folks on this list will need to be there.
Any possibility to move this
meeting to Tue (2/14) or Thur (2/16)?
Thanks !
Mike
From: Anslow, Peter [mailto:panslow@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 10:40 AM
To: STDS-802-3-100GNGOPTX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_100GNGOPTX] SMF Ad Hoc and MMF Ad Hoc
Hi,
As mentioned by Dan, Jonathan
and I are planning to hold an SMF Ad Hoc meeting immediately followed by
an MMF Ad Hoc meeting (1 hour each) starting at 8:00 am Pacific on Wednesday
15 February.
Peter Anslow from Ciena has invited you
to join a meeting on the Web, using WebEx. Please join the meeting 5-10
minutes early so we may begin on time.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Topic: "SMF Ad Hoc followed by MMF Ad Hoc"
Date & Time: Wednesday, 15 February 2012 at 16:00, GMT Time (London,
GMT)
To join web meeting click here: https://ciena.webex.com/ciena/j.php?ED=136346567&UID=0&PW=NMmQzOWQ1OWY5&RT=MTgjMjE%3D
Meeting password: IEEE (please note passwords are case sensitive)
Teleconference: Call-in number:
+44-203-4333547 (United Kingdom)
4438636577 (United States)
2064450056 (Canada)
Conference Code: 207 012 5535
Meeting number: 689 763 310
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Additional Notes:
- To add this meeting to your calendar program click the following link,
or copy the link and paste it into your Web browser: https://ciena.webex.com/ciena/j.php?ED=136346567&UID=0&ICS=MI&LD=1&RD=18&ST=1&SHA2=bLhEYdTxZnNrm2esxAvIunhZVumD0iMsyKV83ZC/5xU=&RT=MTgjMjE%3D
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Australia, Brisbane :
0730870163
Australia, Melbourne :
0383380011
Australia, Sydney :
0282386454
Austria, Vienna :
01253021727
Belgium, Brussels :
028948259
Bulgaria, Sofia : 024917751
Canada, All Cities :
2064450056
China, All Cities Domestic
: 8008706896
China, All Cities Domestic
: 4006920013
Czech Republic, Prague :
228882153
Denmark, Copenhagen :
32727639
Estonia, Tallinn :
6682564
Finland, Helsinki :
0923193023
France, Paris : 0170375518
Germany, Berlin :
03030013082
Germany, Frankfurt :
06924437355
Hong Kong, Hong Kong :
85230730462
Hungary, Budapest :
017789269
India, Bangalore :
08039418300
India, Chennai - Primary
: 04430062138
India, Mumbai :
02239455533
India, New Delhi :
01139418310
Ireland, Dublin :
015269460
Israel, Tel Aviv : 37630760
Italy, Milan :
0200661900
Japan, Tokyo : 0345808383
Korea (South), All Cities
: 0264903634
Latvia, Riga :
66013622
Lithuania, Vilnius :
52055461
Luxembourg, Luxembourg :
20881245
Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur :
0348190063
Netherlands, Amsterdam :
0207946527
New Zealand, Auckland :
099291734
Norway, Oslo : 21033950
Poland, Warsaw :
223070121
Romania, Bucharest :
318144966
Russian Federation, Moscow
: 4992701688
Singapore, All Cities :
6568829970
Slovak Republic, Bratislava
: 0233418490
Slovenia, Ljubljana :
016003971
Spain, Barcelona :
935452633
Spain, Madrid : 911146624
Sweden, Stockholm :
0850512711
Switzerland, Bellinzona :
0912611463
United Kingdom, All Cities
: 08443386571
United Kingdom, All Cities
: 02034333547
United States, All Cities
: 4438636577
Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh : 84838012419
Regards,
Pete Anslow |
Senior Standards Advisor
43-51 Worship Street |
London, EC2A 2DX, UK
Direct +44 2070 125535 |
From: Daniel Dove [mailto:ddove@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 09 February 2012 17:37
To: STDS-802-3-100GNGOPTX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [802.3_100GNGOPTX] SG Phase - Critters and Objectives
John, Steve;
Thanks for this contribution to the forward progress of the Study Group.
I would like to ask that our participants take the time to open the links
below and refresh themselves on these points.
In my experience, the tendency for a Study Group to get distracted is not
new, and the need to continually remind ourselves of where we are in the
process is essential.
I would add that each project has its own unique characteristics and therefore
the process provides boundaries but the path will always be slightly different.
Given that we (100G Ethernet) have optical PMDs which already exist and
satisfy broad market potential, it changes the relative importance of the
5 criteria responses. We are not just comparing ourselves to prior speeds
or other media types, but to 100G PMDs that are currently available. We
need to be distinct, economically feasible against those alternatives in
order to meet the needs of a broad market, and demonstrate we are technically
feasible as well.
Your advice is appreciated and we should all be diligent to remain within
the process boundaries and seek a path that brings us to a successful PAR
and 5 criteria response. In that regard, focus on the process is essential.
Jonathan and Pete are in the process of setting up a co-joined adhoc meeting
that will address objectives and 5C responses for both the MMF and SMF
technologies. We hope to provide that focus, and define a path for forward
progress.
Best Regards,
Dan