Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: [10GBT-Modeling] RE: [10GBT-Cabling] [10GBASE-T] a channel capacityestimation program for your evaluation

To: Albert Vareljian <albertv@ieee.org>
Subject: Re: [10GBT-Modeling] RE: [10GBT-Cabling] [10GBASE-T] a channel capacityestimation program for your evaluation
From: xichen@marvell.com
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:24:19 -0800
Cc: xichen@marvell.com, William Jones <wjones@solarflare.com>, stds-802-3-10GBT-Cabling@ieee.org, stds-802-3-10GBT-Modeling@ieee.org, stds-802-3-10GBT@ieee.org
Sender: owner-stds-802-3-10gbt@majordomo.ieee.org



Albert,

A few more lines.  It becomes more clear for all of us that the ANEXT is
the key factor that determines how the 10GBase-T standard will look like.
Let's wait until we reach our consensus on how to handle the ANEXT trouble.

Regards,

Xiaopeng

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [10GBT-Modeling] RE: [10GBT-Cabling] [10GBASE-T] a channel capacityestimation program for your evaluation
  - From: Albert Vareljian <albertv@ieee.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [10GBT-Modeling] RE: [10GBT-Cabling] [10GBASE-T] a channel capacityestimation program for your evaluation
Next by Date: Re: [10GBT-Modeling] RE: [10GBT-Cabling] [10GBASE-T] a channel capacityestimation program for your evaluation
Prev by thread: Re: [10GBT-Modeling] RE: [10GBT-Cabling] [10GBASE-T] a channel capacityestimation program for your evaluation
Next by thread: Re: [10GBT-Modeling] RE: [10GBT-Cabling] [10GBASE-T] a channel capacityestimation program for your evaluation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread