RE: [10GBT-Modeling] RE: [10GBT-Cabling] [10GBASE-T] a channel capacity estimation program for your evaluation
Albert
I am less concerned about the RFI since it will be significantly narrowband with respect to the system we are considering where the analog bandwidth is in excess of 300MHz. It is straightforward to exploit the correlation this represents.
regards
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: Albert Vareljian [mailto:albertv@ieee.org]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 2:50 PM
To: xichen@marvell.com
Cc: William Jones; stds-802-3-10GBT-Cabling@ieee.org;
stds-802-3-10GBT-Modeling@ieee.org; stds-802-3-10GBT@ieee.org
Subject: Re: [10GBT-Modeling] RE: [10GBT-Cabling] [10GBASE-T] a channel
capacity estimation program for your evaluation
Xiaopeng,
True. I feel that RF ingress could cause similar to ANEXT trouble too,
especially in the system with high SNR requirements...
There have been reports of RF cancellers being attempted in 1000BASE-T
and VDSL, however their effectiveness remains pretty much a dark area.
Regards,
Albert
xichen@marvell.com wrote:
>Albert,
>
>A few more lines. It becomes more clear for all of us that the ANEXT is
>the key factor that determines how the 10GBase-T standard will look like.
>Let's wait until we reach our consensus on how to handle the ANEXT trouble.
>
>Regards,
>
>Xiaopeng
>
>
>
>
>
>