Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: [10GBT-Modeling] RE: [10GBT-Cabling] [10GBASE-T] a channel capacity estim...




Do you have a list of the errata changed?

George Zimmerman
gzimmerman@solarflare.com
tel: (949) 581-6830 ext. 2500
cell: (310) 920-3860
-----Original Message-----
From: xichen@marvell.com [mailto:xichen@marvell.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:24 AM
To: CDimi80749@aol.com
Cc: stds-802-3-10GBT-Cabling@ieee.org;
stds-802-3-10GBT-Modeling@ieee.org; stds-802-3-10GBT@ieee.org
Subject: Re: [10GBT-Modeling] RE: [10GBT-Cabling] [10GBASE-T] a channel
capacity estim...


Chris,  and everyone,

I have attached the latest copy of my channel capacity estimation
program
to this email.  Please check it out.  If you have any program to get it,
please let me.  I can send you a copy directly.

Best Regards,

Xiaopeng
Marvell Semiconductor

(See attached file: i3e.m)






CDimi80749@aol.com on 02/24/2003 05:14:48 AM

To:    xichen@marvell.com
cc:

Subject:    Re: [10GBT-Modeling] RE: [10GBT-Cabling] [10GBASE-T] a
channel
       capacity estim...




Xiaopeng,

Can you please reply with a copy of  the models you
had distributed in earlier e-mail?

Want to make sure a have the latest copy under discussion.

Regards,

Chris

<< Albert,

 Thank you for your input.  With the consideration of ANEXT, the Shannon
 capacity of CAT-6 is 10Gbps by using the models presented in my
program.
 Accordingly, your calculation shows the Shannon capacity is 12Gbps.  I
 admit this is a significant difference.  However, even with the 12Gbps
 Shannon capacity, there is no way we can achieve 10Gbps effective
 throughput over 100m CAT-6 cable if the ANEXT cannot be suppressed by
any
 meanings.

 Regards,

 Xiaopeng



   >>