RE: [10GBT-Modeling] RE: [10GBT-Cabling] [10GBASE-T] a channel capacity estim...
Do you have a list of the errata changed?
George Zimmerman
gzimmerman@solarflare.com
tel: (949) 581-6830 ext. 2500
cell: (310) 920-3860
-----Original Message-----
From: xichen@marvell.com [mailto:xichen@marvell.com]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:24 AM
To: CDimi80749@aol.com
Cc: stds-802-3-10GBT-Cabling@ieee.org;
stds-802-3-10GBT-Modeling@ieee.org; stds-802-3-10GBT@ieee.org
Subject: Re: [10GBT-Modeling] RE: [10GBT-Cabling] [10GBASE-T] a channel
capacity estim...
Chris, and everyone,
I have attached the latest copy of my channel capacity estimation
program
to this email. Please check it out. If you have any program to get it,
please let me. I can send you a copy directly.
Best Regards,
Xiaopeng
Marvell Semiconductor
(See attached file: i3e.m)
CDimi80749@aol.com on 02/24/2003 05:14:48 AM
To: xichen@marvell.com
cc:
Subject: Re: [10GBT-Modeling] RE: [10GBT-Cabling] [10GBASE-T] a
channel
capacity estim...
Xiaopeng,
Can you please reply with a copy of the models you
had distributed in earlier e-mail?
Want to make sure a have the latest copy under discussion.
Regards,
Chris
<< Albert,
Thank you for your input. With the consideration of ANEXT, the Shannon
capacity of CAT-6 is 10Gbps by using the models presented in my
program.
Accordingly, your calculation shows the Shannon capacity is 12Gbps. I
admit this is a significant difference. However, even with the 12Gbps
Shannon capacity, there is no way we can achieve 10Gbps effective
throughput over 100m CAT-6 cable if the ANEXT cannot be suppressed by
any
meanings.
Regards,
Xiaopeng
>>