| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
> OAM is implemented as a sublayer above the MAC, using frames. So, > exactly what would be the trouble? Passing frames? Precisely. 10GBASE-T is a PHY project. So why are we arguing about support or non-support of functionality that is two layers above it? I don't believe there is any need for an objective with regard to OAM in 10GBASE-T. It's a non-issue. Shimon.