Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Chris,
My requests were
driven by requests I had received for:
a) 4x4 or full matrix
data so you could actually simulate all the crossterms and hence simulate a
system operating over 4 pairs
b) a few other sample
measurements so that you get a better representation of the cable
plant
I have subsequently seen questions on how you
scale actual cable measurements to the limit lines - the questions arise
specifically when you are dealing with a matrix channel. Do you scale each
parameter to the limit line? Do you scale the sum etc.
I think Jose Tellado had
summarized a few different ways of scaling. If you don't have a summary of what
he had summarized, please ask him for it and put it on the
reflector.
Regards,
Sanjay
Kasturia
Editor-in-chief,
802.3an
cell (650) 704-7686
office (408) 653-2235
From: stds-802-3-10gbt@IEEE.ORG [mailto:stds-802-3-10gbt@IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of CDimi80749@AOL.COM Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 12:47 PM To: STDS-802-3-10GBT@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [10GBT] Channel models Sanjay Kasturia had posted a request for additional cabling channel models in an e-mail sent to the 10GBASE-T reflector models to the TF modeling Adhoc group and requested that Sanjay be more specific on the need for and types of additional models
required I’d like to continue this thread in order solicit input from the TF on the need for additional cabling models in order to coordinate and focus the cabling adhoc on the deliverables. The TF established a baseline cabling specification supported by the current set of models. What are the requirements and objectives for additional cabling models?
We need to focus on the development of the standard and generate a list of objectives and requirements for additional channel models that apply to that effort. Towards that end, what are we lacking in channel models??
Regards,
Chris DiMinico Chair: 10GBASE-T Cabling Ad-hoc
In a message dated 4/10/2004 1:19:36 PM Eastern Standard Time, SKasturia@TERANETICS.COM writes:
|