Re: [8023-10GEPON] Presentation on FEC for 10G
Frank,
This is rather a short notice. I will see if I can reach the AE today. If
not, I will find an alternative conference call facility and will post the
details later tonight.
Glen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Chang [mailto:ychang@VITESSE.COM]
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 11:25 AM
> To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Presentation on FEC for 10G
>
> Glen;
>
> Right now the conf call. is planning to be next Monday 9:30AM PDT, no
> conflicts heard so far. Could you provide a EA bridge for this? The agenda
> is for FEC associated discussions. (I believe Frank E. is traveling.)
>
> Frank C.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Kramer [mailto:glen.kramer@teknovus.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 11:08 AM
> To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Presentation on FEC for 10G
>
> Frank,
>
> Thank you for organizing the FEC discussions.
>
> Few people have asked me for a summary of the FEC call. Would you please,
> post to the reflector a short overview of the call: what was discussed and
> any steps planned next.
>
> Also, if you plan another conf call, please announce it on the reflector,
> so
> that those who are interested, but missed the first call could join this
> time.
>
> I also want to remind everybody that the Ethernet Alliance has offered
> 10GEPON group a sponsorship in a form of hosting conference calls. Please,
> let me know if you would like to have a conference call in preparation for
> the September meeting.
>
> Regards,
> Glen
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Frank Effenberger [mailto:feffenberger@HUAWEI.COM]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 9:44 AM
> > To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@listserv.ieee.org
> > Subject: [8023-10GEPON] Presentation on FEC for 10G
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I am interested in putting together a presentation on FEC for 10G
> (serial)
> > PONs. Judging from the materials from the July meeting, I think that
> > there
> > is some common support for the following basic ideas:
> >
> > 1. FEC should be applied at the very lowest layer (streaming-FEC).
> > 2. FEC should be a mandatory part of the line code.
> > 3. FEC codeword size should be aligned with the other EPON structure
> sizes
> > (such as 66b blocks and MPCP time quanta)
> >
> > There are related topics that I don't think we've reached consensus on:
> > a. Choice of basic FEC algorithm (e.g, RS, BCH, etc.)
> > b. Line-rate increasing versus MAC-rate reducing approach
> > c. Code-rate and objective gain values
> > (some of these require collaboration with PMD specialists.)
> >
> > If there are people who are interested in working with me on a
> > presentation
> > on these topic areas, please let me know.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Frank Effenberger
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Glen Kramer [mailto:glen.kramer@teknovus.com]
> > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 5:04 PM
> > To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@listserv.ieee.org
> > Subject: [8023-10GEPON] presentations for September meeting
> >
> > Dear colleagues,
> >
> > It appears that our next meeting will take place on September 18th and
> > 19th
> > (Monday and Tuesday) and the High-Speed SG will meet on 20th and 21st,
> so
> > there will be no overlap and interested people will be able to attend
> both
> > meetings.
> >
> > The meeting venue has not been finalized yet. A venue should be
> announced
> > at
> > least 30 days before the meeting, so expect the announcement very soon.
> >
> > Meanwhile, it is time to start working on presentations for the next
> > meeting.
> >
> > There are many specific topics/features that we have to reach consensus
> > on:
> >
> > Downstream Wavelength
> > Upstream Wavelength
> > Power budgets
> > FEC: Optional or Mandatory
> > FEC Category: Stream-based vs. Frame-based
> > other topics - anything that is in scope of our PAR can be discussed.
> >
> > If you can think of any other topic not listed here, please propose it
> on
> > the reflector.
> >
> >
> > If you have opinion on any of these or other topics, make a presentation
> > with arguments in favor of it. Remember, a proposal should have > 75%
> > support to get accepted as a baseline. It is a good idea to circulate
> > proposals on the reflector and get feedback, and to enlist additional
> > supporters.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Glen