Re: [8023-10GEPON] Ad hoc on 10GEPON channel model
Dear, Frnk E, Piers and all,
This is Akihiro OTAKA from NTT.
As Frank mentioned, we have to understand the definitions.
And I think I don't understand these.
Could you tell me where can I find the IEEE-definitions?
Anyway, what I'd like to require for the 10GE-PON is
to be consistent with our exsisting ODNs.
So I think it is better to understand the "budget" into
at least two parts.
- max channel insertion loss; which is basicaly independent
from the transmission systems.
- penalty; which is related to the characteristics of the
transmitter and reciever of 10GE-PON.
Regards,
A.OTAKA
At 07:46 06/11/22, Frank Effenberger wrote:
>147a263.gif
>
>
>Dear Piers,
>
>I think that there is plenty of common ground to work on here, and I$BCN(B
>sure that this time, we will work out a common framework of terms that
>will satisfy both the IEEE and ITU formalisms. At least, that is my hope.
>
>As for the last sentence you mentioned, the idea is not that the optical
>penalty would be measured$B)(BIndeed, this would be impossible. The idea is
>that the operator should design his fiber route and figure out what his
>penalties should be. I think this approach is especially important for
>the PON application, where we may have various other systems sharing the
>same fiber. In such a system, the path penalty is really beyond the
>control of the equipment manufacturer.
>
>Regards,
>
>Frank E
>
>