Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [8023-10GEPON] FEC Framing Adhoc - upstream synchronization



Frank,

Thanks for this initial work. I like the general approach. Some questions:

      1. What is intended by the statement that the signal on the fiber would include "IDLE blocks" at the start of a burst (slide 8)?  Does this mean FEC codewords that consist entirely of 66b blocks which (in turn) consist solely of IDLEs?? 

      2.  Would the leader frame be a new MPCP type? Is it the case that the leader frame won't actually be passed to the receiving MAC?  

      3. The transmitting PCS apparently performs special handling for the leader frame.  Is it correct to say that the payload of the leader frame is "tailor-made" for the PCS framing/coding scheme and for the requirements of the PMD? 

Best Regards,

- Jeff Mandin 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Mandin 
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 3:43 PM
To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [8023-10GEPON] FEC Framing Adhoc - upstream synchronization

All,

1.  I made minor changes to Frank Effenberger's ppt. (attached) ...  slides now have numbers on them, and I moved the downstream synchronization slides to an appendix for later consideration (as it was primarily upstream issues that led to the adhoc).  Some technical comments from me will follow shortly.

2. Telecon:

Can people attend a telecon this coming Wednesday/Thursday (Dec 13/14) at 1500 PST (2300 GMT,  0800 JST)?  

3. Updated Adhoc participants list:

- Ryan Hirth
- Frank Effenberger
- Frank Chang
- Marek Hajduczenia
- Keiji Tanaka
- Piers Dawe
- Fumio Daido
- Glen Kramer
- Shoichiro Seno

Regards,

- Jeff Mandin

-----Original Message-----
From: EffenbergerFrank 73695 [mailto:feffenberger@HUAWEI.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 12:04 PM
To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] FEC Framing adhoc

Dear All,
Please find attached my draft contribution regarding delineation of FEC encoded 10G EPON signals.  This considers both the continuous downstream and the burst upstream.  I thought this way of discussing things was more logical, since we needed to know what the speed of locking of the continuous method was before we considered the burst mode problem.  

Anyway, there it is. 

On the issue of a conference call, I, too happen to be traveling in Asia (there is a conference in Hong Kong that many are attending).  So, next week would be good for me as well.  

Sincerely,
Frank Effenberger