Re: [8023-10GEPON] Revised 10G budget
Dear All,
I suspect that most of the PMD parameters are probably extrapolated from previous standards (802.3ah) and taken from numerous test data; but I am wondering how some of the non-PMD values influenced the PMD values so far, for example:
1. What architectures are being considered? P2P, P2MP, etc.
2. Maximum and minimum optical splits? What types, PLC, Fused, etc?
3. What is the maximum polarization dispersion for the given architectures?
4. What optical connectors are be used in the design? I suspect APC would be best for minimizing back reflections, etc.
5. Is there a preference on the type of external modulation? Electro-absorptive or Mach-Zender?
6. Is there a reason why SOA has been chosen? Would an EDFA be another allowable option?
7. Will SBS control be used in the OLT and will it be defined in the PMD?
If any or all of the above issues have already been addressed; please except my apologies in advance.
Thank you,
Ken Maricondo
-----Original Message-----
From: Glen Kramer [mailto:glen.kramer@TEKNOVUS.COM]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 3:53 PM
To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Revised 10G budget
Dear Colleagues,
I am surprised by the lack of discussion following Dr. Effenberger's last posting of an updated PMD proposal. I hope the right explanation for this is that the task force is in agreement regarding the proposed PMD parameters and no one has any concerns, questions, or alternative proposals.
If my explanation is correct, please add your name as a supporter of this presentation. However, if you have any concerns or questions, please do not be silent and discuss this on the reflector now.
If you do disagree with any of the proposed parameters, please validate your concerns and/or post an alternative proposal.
I sincerely hope that we will not have a repeat of the situation where some people refrain from raising any concerns between the meetings, but argue against accepting any proposal at the meeting on the basis that more studies were needed. Now is the time to ask questions and do additional studies.
Our hottest item for November meeting is reaching consensus on enough PMD parameters such that we can produce draft 1.0 and initiate task force review phase.
Thank you,
Glen Kramer
Chair, IEEE P802.3av Task Force
________________________________________
From: Frank Effenberger [mailto:feffenberger@HUAWEI.COM]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 1:48 PM
To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [8023-10GEPON] Revised 10G budget
Dear All,
I have taken some of the comments I received on my last Email, and modified the slides to come to the attached version.
What I’ve done is:
1. Reduce the PR10 OLT downstream transmitter Max and Min by 1 dB. (This reverts to the values presented in Takizawa’s slides in September)
2. Reduce the PR10 ONU Rx overload number by 1 dB. (Following the Tx change)
3. Increate the PR20 OLT max power by 1 dB (Makes the Tx range 4 dB, which is more comfortable)
4. Increase the PR20 ONU Rx overload number by 1 dB. (Following the Tx change)
Taken together, these changes then make the PR10 and PR20 ONUs identical in every respect. One less PMD!
This is re-capped on the last slide.
Sincerely,
Dr. Frank J. Effenberger 弗兰克 埃芬博格
Huawei Technologies USA
1700 Alma Drive, Plano TX 75075
Office (732) 625 3002
Cell (908) 670 3889