Re: [8023-10GEPON] [PRX-U3] Power budget for PRX-U3
Suzuki-san and Otaka-san;
I appreciate your this initiative. As you may notice, I earlier put my such comments to D1.0 requesting to take into account -27.6dBm in PRX-D3 (OLT side) as Rx sens OMA (max).
However, I donot agree this number should be whatever you called as the stressed sens.(IEEE_Rx_Str_Sens_OMA). Not sure how differently you define it from conventional IEEE terminology, I suggest you explain how this specs is being determined or tested in the current implementation.
Sound like we are back to original point where we were one year ago. With the introduction of PRX_D3 and PRX_U3, the group have to open the huge can of worms for defining 29dB budget for 1Gb/s EPON.
Sincerely
Frank C.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken-Ichi Suzuki [mailto:kenyichi@ansl.ntt.co.jp]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 3:27 PM
To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] [PRX-U3] Power budget for PRX-U3
Dear all
I re-send my contribution with ppt format just in case
because it was pointed out that my PDF file can not be
seen.
Best regards,
Ken-Ichi
At 2007/12/19 21:52 Ken-Ichi Suzuki wrote:
> Dear Marek,
>
> I am sorry for late response.
> I and Otaka-san would like to propose the revised power budget
> for PRX30.
> Attached please find the PPT document.
>
> (1)I think NTT has already proposed IEEE_Rx_Str_Sen_OMA as
> -27.6 dBm. Basically, I would like to use this value.
> (2)If PRX_U3 use a DFB-LD, TDP and ECP (eye closure penalty)
> should be reduced. (I recommend those values be 1.4 dB.)
> (3)In comparison of the sensitivity difference to confirm
> possible dual-rate receiver technologies, I think we should
> use ideal receiver sensitivities such as IEEE_Rx_Sen_OMA.
>
> Best regards,
> Ken-Ichi
>
> At 2007/12/07 16:00 Hajduczenia, Marek wrote:
>> Dear Otaka-san, Thank You for the confirmation. I will be standing by
>> for the feedback. Best wishes for the weekend
>>
>> Marek Hajduczenia (141238)
>> NOKIA SIEMENS Networks S.A. - COO BBA DSLAM R&D
>> Rua Irmãos Siemens, 1, Ed. 1, Piso 1
>> Alfragide, 2720-093 Amadora, Portugal
>> * marek.hajduczenia@nsn.com
>> (+351.21.416.7472 4+351.21.424.2082
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ext Akihiro OTAKA [mailto:ootaka@ansl.ntt.co.jp] Sent:
>> sexta-feira, 7 de Dezembro de 2007 0:56
>> To: Hajduczenia, Marek
>> Cc: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG; ootaka@ansl.ntt.co.jp;
>> kenyichi@ansl.ntt.co.jp
>> Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] [PRX-U3] Power budget for PRX-U3
>>
>> Dear Marek,
>>
>> This is Akihiro OTAKA, NTT.
>> I'm sorry for this late reply.
>> We are now cheking consistency between the PXR-U3 spec
>> on D1.0 and the existing 1G system.
>> I'd like to send some commnets on the reflecter soon.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Hajduczenia, Marek wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>> so far I have received no comments on the PXR-U3 power budget
>>> proposal which was emailed some time ago.
>>> I would appreciate if all people interested in this topic could at
>>> least inform me whether any discussions are under way and when we
>>> could expect some activity. I need to make sure I can align that with
>>> the future drafting activities, which will be presumably time consuming.
>>> Thank You for Your attention
>>>
>>
>
--
Ken-Ichi Suzuki
NTT Access Network Service Systems Labs.
E-mail:kenyichi@ansl.ntt.co.jp
Tel:+81-43-211-3189/Fax:+81-43-211-8250