|
Frank C.,
the ongoing discussions (we saw them for some time on the
reflector) did not bring us any closer to this target.
Do You have any way on Your mind that could bring us closer
to the goal of either aligning the model with the 802.3ae world definitions as
You suggest or renaming them ?
Thanks
Marek
Hajduczenia (141238)
NOKIA
SIEMENS Networks S.A. – COO BBA DSLAM R&D
Rua
Irmãos Siemens, 1, Ed. 1, Piso 1
Alfragide, 2720-093 Amadora,
Portugal
*
marek.hajduczenia@nsn.com
(+351.21.416.7472 4+351.21.424.2082
Marek/Frank;
Its
really time to re-tweak the spreadsheet.
My
comment is as such parameters like TDP, stress sens etc should be renamed
as they has been already defined and widely adopted by 802.3ae world, sounds
to me which are interpreted differently in this
spreadsheet.
Frank C.
Dear Frank,
thank You for the feedback. It seem that indeed that
are few changes in the diagram.
I will investigate the topic in more detail over the
weekend and prepare an upgraded version of the spreadsheet (for now only to
see how many changes need to be introduced).
I would like to know also the opinion of other TF
members as to what needs to be done about the proposed changes.
BR
Marek
Hajduczenia (141238)
NOKIA
SIEMENS Networks S.A. – COO BBA DSLAM R&D
Rua
Irmãos Siemens, 1, Ed. 1, Piso 1
Alfragide, 2720-093 Amadora,
Portugal
*
marek.hajduczenia@nsn.com
(+351.21.416.7472 4+351.21.424.2082
Dear All,
I have an
observation. Since the IEEE values are the normative ones, it seems
more correct to make the IEEE values drive the ITU values, rather than the
current situation where the ITU values are the entry parameters and the
IEEE are derived from the ITU values.
I’ve looked at
it, and it seems that there are only two pairs of IEEE – ITU cells that
need to be “reversed” in this way.
The attached
diagram shows this, with the reversed arrows colored in blue.
At some point, we might want to incorporate this change in the
sheet. But, just to emphasize, this doesn’t change a single number
that appears. It is only the way that the numbers are calculated.
Just an
observation…
Sincerely,
Frank
Effenberger.
From:
Hajduczenia, Marek [mailto:marek.hajduczenia@NSN.COM]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 3:32
AM
To:
STDS-802-3-10GEPON@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [8023-10GEPON] [Channel Link
Model] Version 2.2 of the Channel Link Model
Spreadsheet
attached please find
the updated version of the channel link model spreadsheet (v2.2) along
with the slideshow to be presented at January meeting.
I would like to point
Your attention to a new tab which was added in the spreadsheet i.e. "Model
parameter definitions" - with the definitions of all the parameters used
in the model along with the proposed indication whether the given
parameter should be normative or informative. Note that the normative /
informative allocation is tentative and subject to change should any
discrepancies be noted.
Please do not hesitate
to post Your comments on both the spreadsheet and the presentation itself.
I would like to thank
all the participants of the channel link model ad hoc, who devoted their
time to develop and extend the functionality of this tool.
Marek
Hajduczenia (141238)
NOKIA SIEMENS Networks
S.A. – COO BBA DSLAM R&D
Rua Irmãos Siemens, 1,
Ed. 1, Piso 1
Alfragide, 2720-093 Amadora,
Portugal
* marek.hajduczenia@nsn.com
(+351.21.416.7472 4+351.21.424.2082
|