Re: [8023-10GEPON] Updated Power Saving presentation
Dear Glen,
Kuroda san has already sent updated slides via submission tool today.
Since some proposal on the last page has been add though I think there is
no big technical changes from previous slides, it would be reasonable to
put it on the post dead line section in time slot.
Thanks,
Kiyoshi Uematsu
-----Original Message-----
From: Glen Kramer [mailto:glen.kramer@TEKNOVUS.COM]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 3:19 AM
To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Updated Power Saving presentation
Dear Uematsu-san,
Do you intend to present this proposal? I have not received any submission
from you. In absence of a new submission, you previously deferred
presentation
(http://www.ieee802.org/3/av/public/2008_04/3av_0804_kuroda_1.pdf) will
automatically get on the agenda. However, if you want to present the updated
slides, you need to send me a new request using the form at
http://www.ieee802.org/3/av/presentproc.html.
Please, note that if the technical changes between the old and new
presentations are significant, the new submission will be considered a
post-deadline submission.
Thank you,
Glen
________________________________________
From: 植松 澄/Kiyoshi Uematsu [mailto:uematsu903@OKI.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 5:42 PM
To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [8023-10GEPON] Updated Power Saving presentation
Dear Folks,
I sent this email last week, but it was not reflected on email reflecter
becase of
our mail server trouble. Sorry about your inconbinence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
An attached is updated Power Saving presentation from the one had to be
deferred.
After the Tokyo meeting, I received several thoughtful comments for the
previous
presentation from colleagues. In these comment, I was aware that concept of
current
MPCP specification is more like framework and open for various venders to
implement
their policies of DBA mechanism. I don’t think that it is good idea to
restrict any kind of
implementation, however I am wondering if we can put some text which contain
an
attention for DBA implementer to reduce the number of REPORT frame
transmission
for Power Saving requirement as informative message.
BRs,
Kiyoshi Uematsu
-----Original Message-----
From: Glen Kramer [mailto:glen.kramer@TEKNOVUS.COM]
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 1:00 PM
To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [8023-10GEPON] April meeting report and plan for May
Dear colleagues,
April interim meeting minutes are available at
http://www.ieee802.org/3/av/public/2008_04/3av_0804_minutes_unapproved.pdf.
Our attendance was very high (70 people), likely helped by the location of
the meeting, and the adjacency to the FSAN meeting, which took place in
Tokyo later that week.
At the meeting, we have reviewed 112 T and TR comments and resolved
editorial comments in bulk. The final comment resolutions are reported in
http://www.ieee802.org/3/av/public/2008_04/3av_0804_comments_d1_2_accepted.p
df.
Unfortunately, we ran out of time and had to defer the following
presentations proposing new features to May:
1. Consideration for Power-Saving functionality (av_0804_kuroda_1.pdf) 2.
Another look at powersave (3av_0804_mandin_3.pdf)
Since the May interim is the last meeting to add new features, I strongly
encourage the authors of the above proposals to fully utilize the reflector
to build the consensus for their proposals. This means circulating the
proposals early and soliciting and addressing the group's feedback before
the meeting. When presented at the May meeting, these proposals should
include not only the rationale for the new features, but also the
descriptions of very specific changes to be made to the draft (exact text to
be added, exact changes to state machines, if any, etc.)
Apart from these two features, the main focus of the meeting will be on
getting the draft ready for working group ballot at the end of July plenary.
This means resolving the existing TBDs and filling the remaining gaps in the
draft.
The table in http://www.ieee802.org/3/av/public/2008_04/3av_0804_closing.pdf
identifies a number of gaps in the draft and lists TF members who
volunteered to provide proposed remedies to fill these gaps. This, however,
does not mean that other members may not or should not address the same
issues and propose remedies of their own. Also, there are likely to be other
omissions in the draft which were not identified so far. I ask the task
force members to be very proactive in reviewing the draft and making
comments focused on bringing the draft to a technically complete state.
Below is our schedule for the current review cycle:
Draft D1.3 is published: April 23, 2008
Comments are due: May 1, 2008
Proposed responses published: May 8, 2008
Comment resolution: May 13-15, 2008
Please, remember that if a comment remedy refers to an external supplement
file, that file is due at the time the comments are due. All standalone
presentations (not comments supplements) are due Monday, May 5th.
Best regards,
Glen Kramer
Chair, IEEE P802.3av "10GEPON" Task Force
glen.kramer@ieee.org