Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [8023-10GEPON] Changes to Clause 45 / D2.0



Marek-

Does this mean that the TF forwarded a draft to WG Ballot that was not technically complete?
(and thus did not meet 802.3 requirements for forwarding  draft to WG Ballot.)

Geoff

At 02:50 AM 7/22/2008 , Hajduczenia, Marek (NSN - PT/Amadora) wrote:

Dear all,

In the light of the discussion during the last meeting, it was identified that Clause 45 is missing registers for 10/1GBASE-PRX FEC parameters. I would like to contribute initial version of the draft of new subclauses to be added to 45.2.1.92 - 45.2.1.95. Note that the proposal is tentative and subject to discussion as well as corrections. I plan to submit this in the form of a comment against D2.0.

If You have any comments, please feel free to post them with the reference to the attached document. Note that on page 16, line 37, reference is made to FEC error indication for 1 Gb/s link, which I was not able to locate anywhere in clause 65. Any hints where it might go ? Here is the text I am referring to "(see @@Subclause 77.2.3.3@@ and @@any_reference_in_clause_65@@)"

Thank You for Your time

Regards

Marek Hajduczenia (141238)
NOKIA SIEMENS Networks S.A.
System Architect - COO BBA DSLAM R&D

Rua Irmãos Siemens, 1, Ed. 1, Piso 1
Alfragide, 2720-093 Amadora, Portugal

* marek.hajduczenia@xxxxxxx
(+351.21.416.7472  4+351.21.424.2337