Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [8023-10GEPON] Changes to Clause 45 / D2.0

Dear all, 
Eric and Zachy pointed out that description in 1.182.x was mixed - this problem is now fixed. 
Question to all interested - do we really need the text which is marked in rex in 1.182 and 1.183 ? I would imagine that we do not need to force FEC error indication funtion always on for 10G link, since we do not do it for 10GBASE-PR either. It was decided it would be optional (so can be enabled or disabled). Thus I believe the text in red can be deleted. Any comments ? 
regards

Marek Hajduczenia (141238)
NOKIA SIEMENS Networks S.A. 
System Architect - COO BBA DSLAM R&D

Rua Irmãos Siemens, 1, Ed. 1, Piso 1
Alfragide, 2720-093 Amadora, Portugal

* marek.hajduczenia@xxxxxxx
(+351.21.416.7472  4+351.21.424.2337

-----Original Message-----
From: Hajduczenia, Marek (NSN - PT/Portugal - MiniMD) 
Sent: terça-feira, 22 de Julho de 2008 12:17
To: 'ext Jeff Mandin'; STDS-802-3-10GEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [8023-10GEPON] Changes to Clause 45 / D2.0


Hi Jeff, 
Thanks for the comments. 
Attached please find the modified documents with changes suggested by Jeff. 
regards

Marek Hajduczenia (141238)
NOKIA SIEMENS Networks S.A. 
System Architect - COO BBA DSLAM R&D

Rua Irmãos Siemens, 1, Ed. 1, Piso 1
Alfragide, 2720-093 Amadora, Portugal

* marek.hajduczenia@xxxxxxx
(+351.21.416.7472  4+351.21.424.2337

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Jeff Mandin [mailto:Jeff_Mandin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: terça-feira, 22 de Julho de 2008 11:04
To: Hajduczenia, Marek (NSN - PT/Amadora)
Subject: RE: [8023-10GEPON] Changes to Clause 45 / D2.0

Marek hi,

Looks good.  I'd suggest the following adjustments:

A) Table 45-69

   For bit 0 and bit 2, the description should have an additional sentence that reads: "In the OLT, this bit always has a value of 1."

   For bit 1, the description should have an additional sentence that reads: "In the ONU, this bit always has a value of 1."

B) Table 45-70

    For bit 2, change the description to read "In the ONU, a write of 1 to this bit configures the FEC decoder to indicate errors to the PCS layer.  Writes are ignored in the OLT".

    For bit 1, change the description to read "In the OLT, a write of 1 to this bit enables FEC in the receiver and a write of 0 disables FEC in the receiver.  Writes of this bit are ignored in the ONU".

    For bit 0, change the description to read "In the ONU, a write of 1 to this bit enables FEC in the transmitter and a write of 0 disables FEC in the transmitter.  Writes of this bit are ignored in the OLT".



Regards,

- Jeff Mandin

-----Original Message-----
From: Hajduczenia, Marek (NSN - PT/Amadora) [mailto:marek.hajduczenia@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:50 PM
To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [8023-10GEPON] Changes to Clause 45 / D2.0

 
Dear all, 

In the light of the discussion during the last meeting, it was identified that Clause 45 is missing registers for 10/1GBASE-PRX FEC parameters. I would like to contribute initial version of the draft of new subclauses to be added to 45.2.1.92 - 45.2.1.95. Note that the proposal is tentative and subject to discussion as well as corrections. I plan to submit this in the form of a comment against D2.0. 

If You have any comments, please feel free to post them with the reference to the attached document. Note that on page 16, line 37, reference is made to FEC error indication for 1 Gb/s link, which I was not able to locate anywhere in clause 65. Any hints where it might go ? Here is the text I am referring to "(see @@Subclause 77.2.3.3@@ and @@any_reference_in_clause_65@@)"

Thank You for Your time 

Regards 

Marek Hajduczenia (141238)
NOKIA SIEMENS Networks S.A. 
System Architect - COO BBA DSLAM R&D

Rua Irmãos Siemens, 1, Ed. 1, Piso 1
Alfragide, 2720-093 Amadora, Portugal

* marek.hajduczenia@xxxxxxx
(+351.21.416.7472  4+351.21.424.2337

Attachment: 3av_0809_hajduczenia_2.pdf
Description: 3av_0809_hajduczenia_2.pdf