Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [10GMMF] TP3 Meeting reminder Aug 31.

Hi TP3ers,

This is attempt 2 on a message I sent yesterday, prior to our meeting

Best Regards

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: LAWTON,MIKE (A-England,ex1)
Sent: 31 August 2004 16:40
To: 'owner-stds-802-3-10gmmf@listserv.ieee.org'
Subject: [10GMMF] TP3 Meeting reminder Aug 31.


Hi Everyone,

Here are my thoughts for discussion on point 5. below.

5. Review work list of addtional items                    Mike

Goal: Define simple, low cost but rigorous testing designed to support interoperability

Process to Follow
=================
Review Lew's proposal presentation along with alternative approaches.

1. List Rx Stressors required to represent the channel:-
        a. Fiber loss/dispersion
        b. Connector loss/dispersion
        c. Time varying factors
        d. Modal Noise
        e. RIN
        f. Jitter
        g. Optical signal conditioning

a+b is being handled with Petre's work.

Who can support c thru g?
Is there anything we can simply tick off the list either with a small amount of work or by accepting what Lew has already proposed?

2. Representation within Link Budget
        - how should it be represented within the link budget ... do we need to do more work to support this
        - How significant is it?
                - is the effect swamped by other factors?

3. Emulation with the stressed Eye Rx Test
        Possible approaches:-
                a. ignore
                b. loss
                c. sinusoidal interferer (single amplitude and frequency)
                d. multiple sinusoidal interferers
                e. impulse response emulation - 2 ray, 3 ray, tapped delay line, Gaussian, Butterworth filter
                f. ??

4. Validation of Chosen Technique
                a. How does it capture the worst case?
                b. How practical is it?
                        - repeatability
                        - calibration
                        - ??
                c. Does it avoid uneccessary complexity?

5. Known assumptions/non idealities and their significance
                a. what simplifications have been made? how significant are they?

6. Other Questions???

Best Regards

Mike



> Michael Lawton wrote:
>
> >Hi Everyone,
> >
> >This is just a short meeting reminder and dial-in info for
> the next TP3 call.
> >
> >Tuesday Aug 31 9am CA, 12 NY, 5pm UK, 6pm Germany
> >
> >Dial in Details
> >===============
> >International Direct Dial (650) 599-0374
> >
> >Meeting ID:                     801803
> >Number of Participants:         25
> >
> >Current Agenda Items
> >====================
> >1. Attendees
> >2. Review notes from last meeting
> >3. Update on experimental results regarding non-idealities
> in E-O-E     Ahbhijit
> >4. Discussion on parameter fitting for the ISI generator
>                    Peter
> >5. Review work list of addtional items
>                    Mike
> >6. Walk in items
> >
> >Talk to you all then.
> >
> >Best Regards
> >
> >Mike
> >
> >
> >
>