Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [10GMMF] TP3 calculation of OSNR for compliance test



I have asked Piers to upload a further, brief, document on the topic of
the noise specification, and calibration, for the TP3 stressed receiver
test.

In the approach described, the signal to noise ratio at the input to the
slicer is considered.

The document also includes a note on RIN and modal noise power
penalties.

If we have time in our TP3 call today, I will ask Mike to slot in a few
moments for me to talk through the document.

Regards,
Nick.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-3-10gmmf@IEEE.ORG
[mailto:owner-stds-802-3-10gmmf@IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Lew Aronson
Sent: 26 October 2004 16:45
To: STDS-802-3-10GMMF@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [10GMMF] TP3 calculation of OSNR for compliance test

Sorry for the late e-mail, my first attempt got bounced as too large a
file size.

Please find attached a calculation I have done for the optical S/N we
need to have on the TP3 compliance signal.  It also has some
calculations of the resulting EDC S/N for different receive powers and
receiver front end sensitivities.

Lew

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Lawton [mailto:mike_lawton@AGILENT.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 2:22 AM
To: STDS-802-3-10GMMF@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [10GMMF] TP3 meeting Agenda + dial in Oct 26


Dear TP3'ers,

Here is the agenda for today's meeting:-

Tuesday October 26th at 9am SJ, 5pm UK, 6pm Germany
Dial in (650) 599-0374, Meeting ID:     136169

        1. List Attendees
        2. Review meeting notes from last week
          3. Agenda additions/changes?
        4. Static Channel Methodology
                - Noise loading - review calculations from Lew
                - Channel types and exact characteristics
                        o review comments from Tom reference rise and
fall time
          5. Jitter
                - Petre kindly agreed to evaluate jitter testing
requirements and the need for a high frequency
                  sinusoidal interferer
          6. Link Budget
                - I think we have agreed that the testing is designed to
emulate the budget
                - Do we need to do more work on the budget?
                - Is our thinking on metrics changing? (PIE-L, PIE-D,
fixed length equalisers)
                - 300m question
          7. OMA Measurement methodology
                - Piers is exploring a histogram vs a slow pattern
approach.

I'm not expecting we work through all the items ... however I want to
keep them on the agenda so we understand our work list and where it
makes sense we can shift around the order.

Talk to you all later.

Best Regards

MIke