Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [10GMMF] the minutes of task4 Nov. 8th meeting



Title: Message
Dear Yu,
 
thank you for task 4 meeting minute. I have one question regarding the conclusion of loosing the input polarization information after about 3m (point 1). Since we experienced sensible pulse changes starting from 150~200m due to input linear polarization orientation, and assuming loosing input state after 3m, my conclusion would be that the pulse changes should be determined in the launching offset section, in the very first few meters. but why we never measured pulse distortion before then at least 100 meters? Stated in a different way, we can manage input polarization state and we see its effect on pulse shape after at least 100 meters or more. This means polarization should be conserved for at least such  a distance otherwise the pulse distortion would be a random variable, not related to the input polarization state, and this is NOT the case.
 
Best regards
 
Stefano
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-3-10gmmf@IEEE.ORG [mailto:owner-stds-802-3-10gmmf@IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Yu Sun
Sent: Mittwoch, 10. November 2004 18:02
To: STDS-802-3-10GMMF@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [10GMMF] the minutes of task4 Nov. 8th meeting

Dear Colleagues,

 

I attached the minutes of task 4 last call. I would appreciate your comments.

 

Best regards,

 

Yu