[10GMMF] Finite equalizer penalties and the TP3 sieve for IPRs
TP3'ers:
I have asked Piers to upload to the public area of the web a PDF file (157
KB unfortunately) detailing concerns I expressed at the microphone and over
coffee at the Vancouver meeting, following up on concerns I expressed on the
reflector in early December, about selecting IPRs in the sieve without
giving some consideration to effect of finite equalizer performance. We
still believe it is a legitimate question.
Some in Vancouver expressed interest in seeing more justification of these
concerns. Here is something in that regard. The document is a bit wordy,
but I think the words spell out the argument in sufficient detail so that it
is more than clear.
Robert
Robert Lingle, Jr
Fiber Design and Transmission Simulation
OFS R&D, Atlanta, GA
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim McVey [mailto:jim.mcvey@FINISAR.COM]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 7:00 PM
To: STDS-802-3-10GMMF@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [10GMMF] TP3 No meeting notice: February 1, 2005 No meeting
Hello all TP3 people,
Based on conversations with various people at the Vancouver meeting, I am
proposing that we discontinue the weekly TP3 call until the work required by
our sub-group requires further calls.
At Vancouver, we completed the receiver test sections with the simple and
comprehensive stressed receiver tests and the receiver jitter tolerance
test. We set parameters in support of these tests. I know that there is
some continuing e-mail traffic about these parameters, but I feel that it
has not coalesced yet. I would suggest that we use the e-mail reflector,
work on studies and presentations in support of aspects of the discussions,
and when ready move for the TP3 conference call to happen again.
If you feel strongly about the call now, or think it is required in the
future, then please send me your agenda items.
Thank you all of you for your help in making so much progress in advancing
the 802.3aq standard.
- Jim McVey
+ 1 650 740 7732