Re: Issues concerning 10GbE speed standards
- To: nuss@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Issues concerning 10GbE speed standards
- From: Dae Young KIM <dykim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:34:56 +0900
- CC: Drew Perkins <drew.perkins@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Paul Bottorff'" <pbottorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Peter_Wang@xxxxxxxx'" <Peter_Wang@xxxxxxxx>, "'rabynum@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <rabynum@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx'" <stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx>
- Organization: Chungnam Nat'l Univ., InfoCom Eng. Dept.
- References: <2072E1221F1DD211848C00104B938E7B733561@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <377792B7.E990FC1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Martin Nuss wrote:
> 4) the lower line rate (10.00 vs. 12.5 Gb/s) directly translates into
> longer distances supported, more power budget, and less penalties (such
> as DMD).
To be exact, the lower Line Bandwidth should translate into longer distances, etc.
If any binary code should consume lower bandwidth than the scrambled NRZ, would
you care for it?
--
Dae Young
http://ccl.chungnam.ac.kr/~dykim/